Volume 20, number 1
 Views: (Visited 419 times, 1 visits today)    PDF Downloads: 283

Danao K, Kale S, Rokde V, Nandurkar D, Mahajan U, Dumore N, Bendale A. R, Naphade V, Tatode A. In Silico Prediction of Antidiabetic Activity of Phytoconstituents of Pterocarpus Marsupium Targeting α-Amylase Enzyme. Biosci Biotech Res Asia 2023;20(1).
Manuscript received on : 02-02-2023
Manuscript accepted on : 27-03-2023
Published online on:  30-03-2023

Plagiarism Check: Yes

Reviewed by: Dr. Nabomita Paul

Second Review by: Dr. Philomena George, Dr. Shahina Akter 

Final Approval by: Dr. Hifzur R. Siddique

How to Cite    |   Publication History    |   PlumX Article Matrix

In Silico Prediction of Antidiabetic Activity of Phytoconstituents of Pterocarpus Marsupium Targeting α-Amylase Enzyme

Kishor Danao1*, Shruti Kale1, Vijayshri Rokde1, Deweshri Nandurkar1, Ujwala Mahajan1, Nitin Dumore2, Atul R. Bendale3, Vaishali Naphade4 and Amol Tatode5

1Dadasaheb Balpande College of Pharmacy, Nagpur, Maharashtra-440037, India

2Dadasaheb Balpande College of Diploma in Pharmacy, Nagpur, Maharashtra 440037, India

3Sandip Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Nashik-422213 Maharashtra, India

4School of pharmaceutical sciences, Sandip University, Nashik 422213 Maharashtra, India

5Smt. Kishoritai Bhoyar College of Pharmacy, Kamptee, Nagpur, Maharashtra-441001, India

Corresponding Author E-mail: kishordanao1982@gmail.com

DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.13005/bbra/3077

ABSTRACT: Background Diabetes is characterized by a metabolic imbalance of blood sugar levels. α-amylase enzyme hydrolyzed starch into glucose units. Current therapy has significant side effects. Current investigation of in silico antidiabetic evaluation of phytoconstituents of Pterocarpus marsupium targeting α-amylase. Methods In silico studies were investigated to determine the binding affinity of phytoconstituents of Pterocarpus marsupium in additional with the crystal structure of α-amylase (PDB ID: 3BC9) with help of Pyrx in autodock vina software. Further, investigate the amino acid interaction residue and impacts on the inhibitory potential of the active phytoconstituents. Additionally, the pharmacokinetics and SwissADME and pkCSM were used as online servers for the toxic effects research. Further, studied the pocket region of amino acid for the binding of phytoconstituents using the Ramachandran plot. Result Molecular docking results proposed that pterostilbenes and liquirtigenin (-8.1 kcal/mol) had best docked against α-amylase as related to native ligand (-5.6 kcal/mol) and metformin (-5.3 kcal/mol). The active phytoconstituent has actively participated in interaction with the amino acid residue leads to blockage of α-amylase activity. Furthermore, the pharmacokinetic and In ADMET investigations, the phytoconstituents toxicological values are within allowable ranges. Conclusion The most promising outcome was revealed by the phytoconstituents of Pterocarpus marsupium that bind to α -amylase. However, it encourages the traditional practice of Pterocarpus marsupium and delivers vital information in drug development and clinical treatment. It promotes traditional approach of Pterocarpus marsupium and provides crucial knowledge for medical research and therapeutic care.

KEYWORDS: ADMET; α-amylase; Diabetes; Docking; In silico; Pterocarpus marsupium

Download this article as: 
Copy the following to cite this article:

Danao K, Kale S, Rokde V, Nandurkar D, Mahajan U, Dumore N, Bendale A. R, Naphade V, Tatode A. In Silico Prediction of Antidiabetic Activity of Phytoconstituents of Pterocarpus Marsupium Targeting α-Amylase Enzyme. Biosci Biotech Res Asia 2023;20(1).

Copy the following to cite this URL:

Danao K, Kale S, Rokde V, Nandurkar D, Mahajan U, Dumore N, Bendale A. R, Naphade V, Tatode A. In Silico Prediction of Antidiabetic Activity of Phytoconstituents of Pterocarpus Marsupium Targeting α-Amylase Enzyme. Biosci Biotech Res Asia 2023;20(1). Available from: https://bit.ly/3M1sdFi

Introduction

Diabetes is the relative issue of the metabolism of starch, fats, and protein that deflect fasting and postprandial glucose level in the body. Diabetes is a chronic disease that impairs the metabolic regulation of blood sugar in the body. α-amylase enzyme hydrolyzed starch into glucose units. In diabetes, the frequency of non-insulin dependent is higher than that of insulin dependent.1 Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a damaged retina, nephron, and neurons that leads to vascular difficulties at all ages people around the world. Currently, WHO has reported that more than 347 million people have worldwide been affected by diabetes, which will be the seventh-driving reason cause of death. In India, approximately 77 million individuals suffered from prediabetic stage.2 However, the diabetic condition relative or all-out shortfall of insulin secreted from pancreas β-cell leads to elevated glucose in the body by insulin-sensitive tissues. Insulin has involved in the metabolisms of kinds of macromolecules like fats, proteins, and carbohydrates.18 Thus, the deflection in the secretion or release may hamper all related functions. Therefore, the free unsaturated fats and glycerol levels rise in the blood. Furthermore, insulin-subordinate diabetes/ type-I is related to obliteration of β-cell while non-insulin subordinate/ type-II is obscure in the etiology and relates with a habitual and environmental problem. 3

Pterocarpus marsupium is an herbal tree belonging Fabaceae family which is regularly found in the southern region of India and Srilanka. This tree is well-known as Malabar kino, Indian kino, Vijasar, Bijasar, and is a significant restorative plant. Hence, Charaka Samhita, which is acceptable to be one of the most seasoned and endured old compositions of Ayurveda concludes the Pterocarpus marsupium for treating diabetes mellitus. 

Pterocarpus marsupium is propagated as a medium to an enormous tree with a stature of up to 30 meters. The outer bark is harsh and vertically cracked. The internal part of the heartwood is a brilliant yellowish shade while the outer sapwood is light yellow. The tree has compound leaves, made up of three leaflets and a spectacular golden yellow blossom.4 The phytochemicals present in the Pterocarcus marsupium are pterostilbene, (-)-epicatechin, pterosupin, marsupsin, protein, pentosan, pseudobaptigenin, liquiritigenin, isoliquiritigenin, garbanzol, 5-de-oxykaempferol, propterol B, marsupinol, irisolidone-7- O-A-L-rhamnopyranoside, alkaloids 0.4%, tannins 5%, Phydroxybenzaldehyde, beudesmol, erythrodirol-3- monoacetate, marsupol, carpusin, propterol have been obtained mainly from the heartwood and root. Multiple phytoconstituents found in Pterocarpus marsupium’s verse sections, which exhibit a wide variety of medicinal efficacy that contain antibiotics, antidiabetic, astringent, anti-diarrheal, and anti-hemorrhagic properties. Also, leaves are employed in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, skin diseases, fractures, ophthalmology, leprosy, rectalgia, and leucoderma, sores, constipation, hemorrhages skin diseases, depurative, boils, stomach pain, and gastrointestinal disorders.5

Molecular docking is the virtual screening computerized program for the prediction of a novel compound that can potentially for the treatment of a complex problem. It is a useful and novel technique to determine remedial dynamic mixtures at atomic level information of ligand-receptor binding. It is précised, fast, cost-effective, and time-saving techniques which eliminate the danger of animal trials.6 However, there are few studies of phytoconstituents of Pterocarpus marsupium inhibit α-amylase. Therefore, in this present study we investigated the novel phytoconstituent of Pterocarpus marsupium against type-II diabetes targeted α-amylase enzyme by in silico method.16

Material and Methods

Molecular docking platform

Pyrx in autodock vina software was used to conduct a molecular docking analysis on all phytoconstituents of Pterocarpus marsupium  that were chosen as ligands against the target α-amylase.7, 17

Selection of protein and preparation of its structure

Phytoconstituents were analysed by in silico method using the crystal structure of Alpha-amylase (PDB ID: 3BC9) complex with inhibitor 6-Amino-4-hydroxymethyl-cyclohex-4-ene-1,2,3-triol (Native ligand) involved in type II diabetes were downloaded in PDB format from the RCSB protein data bank (www.rcsb.org) R-value free was 0.178 and R-value work was 0.151 with resolution 1.35 selected for the present study. The structure of the protein target was prepared and refined using discovery studio visualizer 2021 (https://discover.3ds.com/) then use LigPlot+ v.2.2 to examine how ligands interact with amino acid residue.8 (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/thornton-srv/software/LigPlus/)  3BC9 is a complex structure containing chains A, B, C, D, and E whereas chain A was used to prepare macromolecules and other co-crystallized water molecules and non-standard residue, were removed and added the polar hydrogen atom. Energy minimization and addition of missing amino acid residue done using Swiss-Pdb viewer (https://spdbv.vital-it.ch/). To produce a protonation state at physiological pH, one uses autodock vina, build up geometry optimization, additional polar hydrogen, gasteiger charges, and Kollman charges.9 

Selection of ligands and preparation of its structure

The three-dimensional structure of all phytoconstituents was retrieved from the PubChem database available on the NCBI website (https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). Energy minimization, geometrical confirmation, and hydrogen bond are supplemented done by the PyRx-virtual screening tool. All ligands were put into the PyRx virtual screening programme using the Open Babel control. SDF ligand files are converted to PDB format via the Open Babel programme.10 Additionally, to obtain atomic coordinates for molecules, the Autodock Vina tool (http://vina.scripps.edu/) assists in identifying the torsion root, correcting torsion angles, altering charges, and universal force field optimization (UFF). All chemical structures are shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1: Phytoconstituents of Pterocarpus marsupium.

Click here to view figure

Receptor grid preparation

In order to anticipate biological activity, the fundamental objective of molecular docking was to assess the binding affinity and interaction between macromolecules and ligands based on geometry. PyRx was used for docking in this study’s autodock vina virtual screening programme. For docking, the ligand and protein molecules are chosen. A mesh appears at the top of the protein structure. The size of the grid will be adjusted according to the binding pocket of the receptor at coordinate X, Y, and Z were set around the centroid of the active site to center X= 29.1394, Y= -1.5685, Z= 14.5186 and dimension coordinates at X= 89.5549, Y= 72.9128, Z= 69.6540. Further, PyRx in Autodock Vina will start. However, the protein-ligand interaction was analyzed using digital studio visualizer (DSV) 2021 (https://discover.3ds.com/) and LigPlot+ v.2.2 (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/thornton-srv/software/LigPlus/).

Molecular properties and ligand based ADME/T analysis

The pharmacokinetic study and toxicological parameter of the compound are important for the selection of potential drug candidates. We are selected the pkCSM and SwissADME online server tool for evaluation of molecular properties and toxicity study. The chosen ligands were further subjected to Lipinski rule of five screening using the criteria of molecular weight 500, logP 5, hydrogen bond acceptor 10, and topological polar surface area 140 (Ǻ).11

PkCSM (http://biosig.unimelb.edu.au/pkcsm /prediction) is a database server online where ligands are evaluated for forecasting ADME and toxicological qualities by uploading SMILES of ligands. Additionally, the molecular characteristics such as molecular weight, logP, hydrogen bond donor, hydrogen bond acceptor, and topological polar surface area were obtained. Additionally, toxicological characteristics such as LD50, LOAEL, human maximum tolerated dose, AMES toxicity, hepatotoxicity, skin toxicity, T. pyriformis toxicity, hERG-I inhibitor, hERG-II inhibitor, and minnow toxicity were also obtained.12

SwissADME (http://www.swissadme.ch/index.php) is an online server in which ligands as uploaded Simplified Molecular Input Line Entry System notation (SMILES), followed by predicting various physicochemical and pharmacokinetic parameters of the ligands.13

Ramachandran Plot

The plot indicates the allowed region of α-amylase enzyme for the binding of phytoconstituents. It is determined by using discovery studio visualizer 2021.

Hydrophobicity Plot

The plot quantitatively determines the tendency of hydrophobicity or hydrophobicity of amino acids of enzyme (α-amylase). The plot is depicted from discovery studio visualizer 2021.

Result and Discussion

The alpha (α)-amylase is a metalloenzyme that includes calcium ion which helps in digestion with the cleavage of complex molecule polysaccharide into simpler form likewise glucose and maltose. Further, this enzyme leads to causes of hyperglycemia and elevated blood sugar level. α-Amylase is thrust area to therapeutic target for management postprandial elevated blood sugar level.14 Currently, allopathic medications are utilized to treat diabetic mellitus; nevertheless, these medications have had major negative side effects and disrupted people’s regular lives. These days, herbal therapies are receiving greater attention for treating a variety of disorders since they have few side effects.15 The objective of the current investigation was to assess the ability of plant phytoconstituents of Pterocarpus marsupium  to inhibit the enzyme -amylase. In this work, we used Pyrx in autodock vina to do molecular docking experiments on all phytochemicals discovered in Pterocarpus marsupium, then we examined how these interactions with amino acid residues affected the activity of the active ingredients. Using the SwissADME and pkCSM online servers, selected ligands with the greatest match were further assessed for their absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity (ADMET) characteristics.

Molecular docking studies

Native ligand is present in the protein structure (PDB ID: 3BC9) with the co-crystallized form which re-docked exhibited the similar pattern of interaction as found in the reported in the literature, along with binding energy -5.6 kcal/mol, where ASP350, GLU380, ASP447, ARG348, and ARG348 indicated hydrogen bonding catalytic residue and hydrophobic pocket region HIS233, ALA351, LEU315, VAL230, MET316, ARG450, TYR180, TRP131 and TRP382 (Figure 2).

Figure 2: Overlapping structure of co-crystallized ligand and re-docked ligand.

Click here to view figure

The docking score and binding energy of all phytoconstituents of Pterocarpus marsupium targeting α-amylase and interaction of amino acid residue with bonding distance are shown in Tables 1 & 2, respectively. 

Table 1: Docking score of ligands against α-amylase (PDB ID: 3BC9)

Sr. No.

Ligands/Inhibitors

PubChem ID

Docking Score

1

Pterostilbene

5281727

-8.1

2

(-)-Epicatechin

72276

-7.9

3

Pterosupin

133775

-7.9

4

Liquirtigenin

114829

-8.1

5

Garbanzol

442410

-7.6

6

5-Deoxykaempferol

5281611

-7.1

7

Propterol

185124

-7.2

8

Marsupin

134369

-7.6

9

Chalcone

637760

-7.1

10

Isoliquirtigenin

638278

-7.6

11

Pseudobaptigenin

5281805

-8.1

12

Marsupol

349350392

-6.9

13

Lupeol

259846

-7.5

14

Pterocarpan

6451349

-7.4

15

Beta-Eudesmol

91457

-7.0

16

4-Hydroxybenzaldehyde

126

-5.4

17

Native ligand

193758

-5.6

18

Metformin

4091

-5.3

19

Voglibose

444020

-6.0

The docking binding energy of placed native ligand at 17th position and reference standard compounds [Metformin & Voglibose] at 18th & 19th position which is lower than many phytoconstituents of Pterocarpus marsupium .20 The reference standard binding energy of metformin & voglibose is -5.3 kcal/mol & -6.0 kcal/mol, respectively. Metformin interacts with amino acid along with conventional hydrogen bonding HIS446 & ASP447, and hydrophobic interaction GLU380, ASP350, ASP447, HIS446, LEU315, TRP382, MET316, ARG450, TRP131, TYR184, ARG348, ALA351 & HIS354. Voglibose fit in protein pocket with hydrogen bonding is GLU120, ARG524, ARG524, ALA474, ASN122, GLY476, ARG501, and VAL121 and hydrophobic amino acid interaction with PHE527, TYR506, ARG501, HIS123, GLU475, PRO478, and VAL477 (Figure 3).

Figure 3: Binding interaction and docked pose of Metformin (A) & Voglibose (B) targeting α-amylase (PDB ID: 3BC9). The ligand (Pink) and amino acid residue (Red) binding pocket represent in ball & stick

Click here to view figure

Analysis of binding affinity of selected phytoconstituents of Pterocarpus marsupium in the ranges of -8.1 to -5.4 kcal/mol. from docked result, it is observed that Pterostilbene, Liquirtigenin and Pseudobaptigenin exhibit highest binding affinity (-8.1 kcal/mol) in complex with α-amylase, as compared to other phytoconstituents viz. (-)-Epicatechin (-7.9 kcal/mol), Pterosupin(-7.9 kcal/mol), Garbanzol (-7.6 kcal/mol), 5-Deoxykaempferol (-7.1 kcal/mol), Propterol (-7.2 kcal/mol), Marsupin (-7.6 kcal/mol), Chalcone (-7.1 kcal/mol), Isoliquirtigenin (-7.6 kcal/mol), Marsupol (-6.9 kcal/mol), Lupeol (-7.5 kcal/mol), Pterocarpan (-7.4 kcal/mol), Beta-Eudesmol (-7.04 kcal/mol) and 4-Hydroxybenzaldehyde (-5.4 kcal/mol), respectively.

Figure 4: Phytoconstituents binding interaction with α-amylase (PDB ID: 3BC9) visualized by DSV and LigPlot+ v.2.2

Click here to view figure

Based on visual inspection, computational docking of phytocompounds on α-amylase substantially involves many types of interactions, including hydrogen bonds and hydrophobic bonds, alkyl, pi-stacking, and pi-alkyl interaction for the stable complex with -amylase. Additionally, it showed that voglibose and metformin had a similar binding pattern to α-amylase.

Pterostilbene, Liquirtigenin, and Pseudobaptigenin were suitably positioned in the pocket of           α-amylase based on the docking results. The hydrogen interaction between the hydroxyl group of pterostilbene and the ASP350 and HIS354 molecules, with bond lengths of 2.75 and 2.93, is attributed to the formation of the -alkyl and -cationic & anionic interaction and the binding pocket formed by HIS446, TYR184, TRP382, LYS353, ALA351, TYR455, MET316, and ASP447 on -amylase (Figure 4). Pterostilbene is reported to have antidiabetic effect when fed orally to streptozotocin (STZ)-nicotinamide-induced diabetic rats for 2, 4, and 6 weeks.11 Due to the presence of a C=O group and a centroid benzene ring that forms a hydrophobic pocket area with TRP310, TRP306, TRP304, TYR357, GLU312, ASN309, ASP305, LEU248 & SER303 on α-amylase, Liquirtigenin has created hydrogen bonding interactions with ASP311 & THR307 at 2.34 (Ǻ) & 2.45 (Ǻ). These observations are reported in the literature that liquirtigenin shows antidiabetic activity in streptozotocin induced Swiss albino mice by inhibiting α-amylase. Pseudobaptigenin is appropriately covered the hydrophobic pocket region of the protein with LEU315, MET316, HIS233, ASP447, TRP131 & TRP382. Vijayan et al, has reviewed Pterocarpus marsupium showed the anti-diabetic potential for the management of hyperglycemia, along with good antioxidant activity.

Table 2: Inhibitors interactions with the α-amylase binding (PDB ID: 3BC9)

Ligands/ Inhibitors

Binding Energy (kcal/mol)

              Amino acid interaction

With hydrogen bond

Interaction distance (Ǻ)

With hydrophobic bond

Pterostilbene

-8.1

ASP350

HIS354

2.75

2.93

HIS446, TYR184, TRP382, LYS353, ALA351, TYR455, MET316, ASP447

Liquirtigenin

-8.1

ASP311

THR307

2.34

2.45

TRP310, TRP306, TRP304, TYR357, GLU312, ASN309, ASP305, LEU298, ASN248, SER303

Pseudobaptigenin

-8.1

No interaction

LEU315, MET316, HIS233, ASP447, TRP131, TRP382

(-)-Epicatechin

-7.9

THR307

ASN309

2.58

2.60

ASP311, TRP310, TRP386, TRP304

Pterosupin

-7.9

GLU586

TRP488

ASP449

SER458

ARG450

2.81

2.31

2.48

2.34

3.06

MET490, SER461, ILE459, ASP484, TYR460, THR448, VAL457, ASP451

Garbanzol

-7.6

ASP350

2.13

ARG450, GLU380, ALA351, TYR184, TRP131, TYR455, MET316, LEU315, HIS354, LYS353, TRP382, ARG348, ASP447

Marsupin

-7.6

GLU380

ARG450

2.21

2.35

TYR455, TRP382, MET316, HIS233, TYR184, ASP447

Isoliquirtigenin

-7.6

THR307

2.34

TRP306, TRP310, TRP304, TYR357, LEU298, ASP305, ASP311, SER303, ASN248

Lupeol

-7.5

ASP451

2.34

TRP488, TYR460, ILE459, LYS463, MET490, SER458, ASP449, ARG450

Pterocarpan

-7.4

No interaction

ASP447, ALA351, TRP382, TYR455, GLU380, LEU315, ASP350, ARG348

Propterol

-7.2

GLU380

ARG348

ASP447

 

2.19

2.47

2.22

 

ALA351, HIS354, TYR184, MET316, TRP382, LYS353, LEU 315, ARG450, ASP350, TRP131, MET235, HIS446

5-Deoxykaempferol

-7.1

No interaction

LEU315, MET316, HIS233, ASP447, TRP131, TRP382

Chalcone

-7.1

No interaction

TRP382, ASP447, TYR184, LEU315, GLU380, ALA351, ASP350, ARG346, TYR455, ARG450, TRP131, HIS446

Beta-Eudesmol

-7.0

TRP382

LYS353

2.80

2.75

TYR455, ASP447, LEU315, GLU380, ALA351, HIS354

Marsupol

-6.9

No interaction

HIS315, HIS354, ALA351, TRP131, ASP350, ARG348, LYS353

4-Hydroxybenzaldehyde

-5.4

TRP306

THR307

THR307

ASN309

2.77

2.25

2.77

2.87

TRP310, ASP311, ASP313, GLU312

Native ligand

-5.6

ASP350

GLU380

ASP447

ARG348

ARG348

HIS446

2.72

2.91

2.39

2.61

3.14

2.78

HIS233, ALA351, LEU315, VAL230, MET316, ARG450, TYR180, TRP131, TRP382

Metformin

-5.3

HIS446

ASP447

2.42

2.12 

GLU380, ASP350, ASP447, HIS446, LEU315, TRP382, MET316, ARG450, TRP131, TYR184, ARG348, ALA351, HIS354

Voglibose

-6.0

GLU120

ARG524

ARG524 ALA474

ASN122

GLY476

ARG501

VAL121

2.04

2.65

2.26

2.56

2.36

2.87

2.43

3.10

PHE527, TYR506, ARG501, HIS123, GLU475, PRO478, VAL477

(-)-Epicatechin shows binding energy of 7.9 kcal/mol. it possesses a hydroxyl group which makes hydrogen bonding with amino acid THR307, ASN309 along with bond lengths 2.58 & 2.60. The presence of ketonic groups interacted with hydrophobic bonding viz. pi-stacking, pi-pi sigma with amino acid ASP311, TRP310, TRP386, TRP304. Pterosupin have containing hydroxyl group & ketone cyclic function shows binding energy -7.9 kcal/mol which is more than the reference drug. It possesses hydrogen interaction with amino acid residues GLU586, TRP488, ASP449, SER458, ARG450 at bond lengths 2.81, 2.31 2.48, 2.34 & 3.06 respectively. Also, Pterosupin has interacted with amino acid residue MET490, SER461, ILE459, ASP484, TYR460, THR448, VAL457, and ASP451 along with the pi-alkyl bond. Garbanzol has a binding energy of 7.6 kcal/mol with the interaction amino acid residues ASP350 2.13 ARG450, GLU380, ALA351, TYR184, TRP131, TYR455, MET316, LEU315, HIS354, LYS353, TRP382, ARG348, and ASP447. Marsupin has docked with binding energy 7.6 kcal/mol, it has hydroxyl groups involved in hydrogen bonding with amino acid residues GLU380, ARG450 with bond lengths 2.21 & 2.35. TYR455, TRP382, MET316, HIS233, TYR184, ASP447. 

Isoliquirtigenin having binding energy -7.6 kcal/mol with the presence of hydroxyl function build conventional hydrogen bonding THR307 with bond length 2.34. Also, hydrophobic interaction with pi-pi stacking bond at amino acid residues TRP306, TRP310, TRP304, TYR357, LEU298, ASP305, ASP311, SER303, ASN248. Lupeol having binding energy -7.5 kcal/mol at the presence of hydroxy function stabilized conventional hydrogen bonding ASP451 with bond length 2.34 and also, interacted with amino acid residue pocket TRP488, TYR460, ILE459, LYS463, MET490, SER458, ASP449, ARG450. Pterocarpan has binding energy -7.4 kcal/mol with no hydrogen bond interaction. Also, binding pocket region amino acid residue ASP447, ALA351, TRP382, TYR455, GLU380, LEU315, ASP350, ARG348. Propterol having binding energy -7.2 kcal/mol with conventional hydrogen binding GLU380, ARG348, & ASP447 at bond length 2.19, 2.47, & 2.22 respectively. Also hydrophobic pocket region ALA351, HIS354, TYR184, MET316, TRP382, LYS353, LEU 315, ARG450, ASP350, TRP131, MET235, HIS446. 5-Deoxykaempferol having binding energy -7.1 kcal/mol with no hydrogen interaction still entrapped at pocket region LEU315, MET316, HIS233, ASP447, TRP131, TRP382. Chalcone is having binding energy -7.1 kcal/mol at none hydrogen bonding and also, fits pocket region TRP382, ASP447, TYR184, LEU315, GLU380, ALA351, ASP350, ARG346, TYR455, ARG450, TRP131, HIS446. Moreover, Beta-Eudesmol binds at binding energy -7.0 kcal/mol with conventional hydrogen binding TRP382, LYS353 at bond length 2.80, & 2.75. Also, pi-sigma and pi-alkyl interaction TYR455, ASP447, LEU315, GLU380, ALA351, HIS354. Marsupol is bound with binding energy -6.9 kcal/mol at no hydrogen interaction. Also, hydrophobic interacted amino residue pocket region HIS315, HIS354, ALA351, TRP131, ASP350, ARG348, and LYS353. 4-Hydroxybenzaldehyde is showing binding energy -5.4 kcal/mol with conventional hydrogen interaction TRP306, THR307, THR307, and ASN309 with bond lengths 2.77, 2.25, 2.77, and 2.87. Also, hydrophobic pocket region TRP310, ASP311, ASP313, GLU312. However, anti-hyperglycemic effect of Pterocarpus marsupium seed extract (100 mg/kg and 200 mg/kg) on gabapentin-induced hyperglycemia in Wistar albino rats was tested in vivo. Further, the study suggested that on clinical-based 52 patients had a trial for 12 weeks of Pterocarpus marsupium significantly using the student’s paired t-test, medications that were demonstrated to reduce fasting blood glucose, postprandial blood glucose, and glycosylated haemoglobin were compared to baseline. It is statically significant by p-value calculated for all parameters is 0.05. However, the study supports our finding of potential lead moiety in Pterocarpus marsupium to achieve the antidiabetic effect.

ADME and toxicity studies

The pharmacokinetic and toxicological profile of phytoconstituents is critical for transforming a chemical into a powerful medicine. In this work, we use the SwissADME and pkCSM servers to conduct ADMET investigations. The partition coefficient (log P) and total polar surface area (TPSA) of the molecule define its absorption and lipophilicity potential, respectively. When the TPSA is greater than 140, the drug molecule easily penetrates the cell membrane. However, the optimal Log P value of pharmaceuticals is critical for the specific pharmacological target. The Log P-value for oral and sublingual absorption is 1.35 – 1.80; sublingual absorption is greater than 5, while the central nervous system is less than 2. Furthermore, drug penetration to the blood-brain barrier (BBB) ranges between -3.0 and 1.2, whereas ligand aqueous solubility ranges between -6.5 and 0.5. Additionally, P-glycoprotein substrate is responsible for the efflux of a substrate from inside to outside the cell, and its inhibition causes drug resistance. Further, human intestinal absorption (HIA, %) of ligands are characterized into low, medium and high value ranges 0 – 29 %, 30 – 79%, and 80 – 100 %, respectively. 

Table 3: ADME and toxicity profiles of ligands with high docking scores

ADMET

Properties

Molecular formula

Molecular weight [g/mol]

Log P

TPSA
[A0]

HB
Donor

HB
Acceptor

Aqueous solubility
[log
mol/ L]

Human intestinal
absorption (%)

Blood brain barrier

Pterostilbene

C16H16O3

256.30

3.02

38.69

1

3

-3.905

92.395

0.317

(-)-Epicatechin

C15H14O6

290.27

1.47

110.38

5

6

-3.117

68.829

-1.054

Pterosupin

C21H24O10

436.41

2.35

188.14

8

10

-2.791

49.815

-1.256

Liquirtigenin

C15H12O4

256.25

1.73

66.76

2

4

-3.304

94.333

0.375

Garbanzol

C15H12O5

272.256

1.7751

86.99

3

5

-2.788

93.102

-0.586

5-Deoxykaempferol

C15H10O5

270.24

1.73

90.90

3

5

-3.405

92.943

-0.864

Propterol

C15H16O3

244.29

1.95

60.69

3

3

-3.063

91.686

-0.087

Marsupsin

C16H14O6

302.28

1.20

96.22

3

6

-3.126

74.906

-0.794

Chalcone

C15H12O

208.26

2.54

17.07

0

1

-4.461

94.977

0.56

Isoliquirtigenin

C15H12O4

256.25

2.02

77.76

3

4

-3.06

91.096

-0.717

Pseudobaptigenin

C16H10O5

282.25

2.48

68.90

1

5

-3.084

97.239

-0.309

Lupeol

C30H50O

426.72

4.68

20.23

1

1

-5.861

95.782

0.726

Pterocarpan

C15H12O2

224.25

2.51

18.46

0

2

-3.86

99.271

0.315

Beta-Eudesmol

C15H26O

222.37

3.06

20.23

1

1

-4.9

94.296

0.634

4-Hydroxy benzaldehyde

C7H6O2

122.12

0.99

37.30

1

2

-0.985

87.261

-0.217

Metformin

C4H11N5

129.16

0.34

91.49

3

2

-2.707

59.401

-0.946

Voglibose

C10H21NO7

267.28

0.52

153.64

8

8

-1.724

24.211

-1.321

ADMET

Properties

P-glycoprotein substrate

Total clearance [log ml/min.kg]

Bioavailability score

AMES Toxicity

Max. tolerated dose [log mg/kg.d]

hERG-I Inhibitors

hERG-II
Inhibitors

Pterostilbene

YES

0.228

0.55

YES

0.438

NO

NO

(-)-Epicatechin

YES

0.183

0.55

NO

0.438

NO

NO

Pterosupin

YES

-0.004

0.55

NO

0.634

NO

NO

Liquirtigenin

YES

0.065

0.55

NO

-0.351

NO

NO

Garbanzol

YES

0.007

0.55

YES

0.147

NO

NO

5-Deoxykaempferol

YES

0.492

0.55

NO

0.479

NO

NO

Propterol

YES

0.081

0.55

NO

0.52

NO

NO

Marsupsin

YES

0.151

0.55

NO

0.048

NO

NO

Chalcone

YES

0.223

0.55

NO

1.031

NO

NO

Isoliquirtigenin

YES

0.087

0.55

NO

0.118

NO

NO

Pseudobaptigenin

NO

0.153

0.55

YES

0.116

NO

YES

Lupeol

NO

0.153

0.55

NO

-0.502

NO

YES

Pterocarpan

YES

0.107

0.55

YES

0.285

NO

NO

Beta-Eudesmol

NO

1.032

0.55

NO

-0.22

NO

NO

4-Hydroxybenzaldehyde

NO

0.565

0.55

NO

1.248

NO

NO

Metformin

YES

0.1

0.55

YES

0.902

NO

NO

Voglibose

YES

0.906

0.55

NO

1.453

NO

NO

ADMET

Properties

Acute oral rat toxicity LD50 [mol/kg]

Oral rat chronic toxicity [log mg/kg bw/day]

Hepatotoxicity

Skin sensitization

T.pyriformis Toxicity [log μg/L]

Minnow toxicity [log/mmol/L]

Lippinskies
rule violations

Pterostilbene

2.057

1.773

NO

NO

1.286

0.459

NO

(-)-Epicatechin

2.428

2.5

NO

NO

0.347

3.585

NO

Pterosupin

2.501

4.509

NO

NO

0.285

6.549

NO

Liquirtigenin

2.365

2.132

NO

NO

0.44

1.21

NO

Garbanzol

2.248

2.186

NO

NO

0.404

2.23

NO

5-Deoxykaempferol

2.428

1.977

NO

NO

0.474

1.536

NO

Propterol

2.456

1.577

NO

NO

0.76

1.555

NO

Marsupsin

1.918

2.702

NO

NO

0.368

1.854

NO

Chalcone

1.843

1.209

NO

YES

1.349

0.835

NO

Isoliquirtigenin

2.427

2.049

NO

NO

0.691

2.081

NO

Pseudobaptigenin

2.422

1.278

NO

NO

0.383

-0.344

NO

Lupeol

2.563

0.89

NO

NO

0.316

-1.696

NO

Pterocarpan

2.258

1.971

NO

NO

1.076

0.134

NO

Beta-Eudesmol

1.727

1.304

NO

YES

1.805

0.412

NO

4-Hydroxy benzaldehyde

1.902

2.635

NO

YES

-0.133

1.883

NO

Metformin

2.453

2.158

NO

YES

0.25

3.972

NO

Voglibose

1.989

4.454

NO

NO

0.285

6.767

YES

Based on the ADMET studies, all the selected ligands obey Lipinski’s rule. Followed, all ligands are an acceptable range for TPSA, Log P, and BBB parameters, and also, ligands are satisfied % HIA, bioavailability score, and total clearance. Furthermore, the ligands were expected to be free of AMES toxicity, hepatotoxicity, and skin sensitivity. Table 3 shows that it did not suppress hERG-I (low risk of cardiac toxicity), Tetrahymena pyriformis toxicity, minnow toxicity, maximum tolerated dosage, rat acute oral toxicity, and chronic toxicity. Erstwhile, in vivo evidence revealed that Pterocarpus marsupium seed ethanolic extract at doses of 100 mg/kg and 200 mg/kg had significantly lower blood glucose levels on days 1, 7, 14, and 21 compared to disease control rats. Furthermore, various extracts of Pterocarpus marsupium (100 mg/kg body weight) administered to streptozotocin induces diabetes rat with continuous 10 days reduced blood sugar level, and serum insulin level. Additionally, several phytoconstituents such flavonoids, terpenoids, cardiac glycosides, alkaloids, glycosides, saponins, tannins, proteins, and carbohydrates in ethanol, acetone, and isopropyl alcohol (IPA) (1:1) extracts of Pterocarpus marsupium stem wood.19 This investigation supports our in silico study that pterostilbenes and liquirtigenin have the lowest binding energy (-8.1 kcal/mol) with complex α-amylase to reduce blood sugar levels. Hence, it is manifest that our study screened phytoconstituents have binding energy, docking score, and interaction with catalytic residue, leading to blocking the action of α-amylase to restrict diabetes. Amongst all phytoconstituents only pterostilbenes and liquirtigenin show potential inhibition of α-amylase metalloenzyme to regulate the blood sugar in the body.

Ramachandran Plot

In the present study, α-amylase enzyme had the presence of the core region for the binding of ligands. The phi-psi torsion angles of all residues in the protein structure are depicted in Figure 5. The presence of green dots reflects the core region, which is the best phi-psi value which is indicted the percentage of residues to binding with ligands.

Figure 5: Ramachandran plot showing allowed region in α-Amylase.

Click here to view figure

Hydrophobicity Plot

This plot is numerical representation of degree of hydrophobicity or hydrophilicity of the α-amylase enzyme. The x-axis shows amino acid sequence of protein, while y-axis represent degree of hydrophobicity or hydrophilicity shown in Figure 6. Our plot depicted that the α-amylase enzyme highly interacted with ligands.

Figure 6: Hydropathy plot showing tendency of phytoconstituent to fold in solvent (Hydrophobic).

Click here to view figure

Conclusion

Pterocarpus marsupium, a medicinal plant traditionally used as an antidiabetic, has phytoconstituents with the ability to cure diabetes. The results of a computationally guided algorithm screening of chosen phytoconstituents of the plant were highly selective, had great binding potential, and had the best match with α-amylase enzyme. It has been hypothesized that pterostilbene and liquirtigenin may have strong inhibitory effects against α-amylase based on the analysis of the ligands with the highest docking scores that are positioned at the site of inhibition, interaction profiles with catalytic residues, and acceptable ADMET parameters. The most encouraging outcome was shown by the phytoconstituents of Pterocarpus marsupium that were targeted α-amylase. However, it supports Pterocarpus marsupium customary behaviour and provides crucial data for clinical diagnosis and therapeutic research.

Acknowledgments 

The authors are thankful to Management and Dr. (Mrs.) U. N. Mahajan, Principal, Dadasaheb Balpande College of Pharmacy, Nagpur for giving moral supports throughout the work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests. 

Funding Sources

There are no funding source.

References

  1. Chiu-Chung Jung and Allen Taylor. Dietary Hyperglycemia, Glycemic Index and Metabolic Retinal Diseases. Retin. Eye Res., 2011, 30 (1):18–53.
    CrossRef
  2. Jomana. Double or hybrid diabetes: A systematic review on disease prevalence, characteristics and risk factors. Nutr. Diabetes. 2019, 9(1):1–9.
    CrossRef
  3. Mishra A, Srivastava  R,  Srivastava  SP, Gautam  S, Tamrakar  AK,  Maurya  R and Srivastava  Antidiabetic  activity  of  heart  wood  of  Pterocarpus marsupium  Roxb and  analysis  of phytoconstituents. Indian J Exp Biol. 2013, 51(5):363-74.
  4. Perera   Antidiabetic effects of Pterocarpus marsupium (Gammalu).  Europ  J  Med  Plants. 2016, 13(4):1-14.
    CrossRef
  5. Hilal A, Kalyanaraman R. Pharmacology of Pterocarpus marsupium  Med Plant Res. 2015, 5:1-6.
  6. Meng, H. Zhang, X., M. Mezei, M. Cui, Molecular Docking: A powerful approach for structure-based drug discovery. Curr. Comput. Aid. Dru. Des., 2011, 7(2):146–57.
    CrossRef
  7. Pawar, S. Rohane. Role of Autodock vina in PyRx Molecular Docking. Asian J. Research Chem., 2021, 14(2):132–34.
    CrossRef
  8. Wallace, R Laskowski and J. Thornton. LIGPLOT: a program to generate schematic diagrams of protein-ligand interactions. Protein Eng., 1995, 8(2):127–34.
    CrossRef
  9. Ricci-López, A. Vidal-Limon et al., Molecular modeling simulation studies reveal new potential inhibitors against HPV E6 protein. PLoS ONE., 2019, 14(3):1–22.
    CrossRef
  10. O’Boyle, M. Banck, C James. Open Babel: An open chemical toolbox. J. Cheminform., 2011, 3(33):1-14
    CrossRef
  11. Benet, C. Hosey, O. Ursu, T. Oprea. BDDCS, the Rule of 5 and Drugability. Adv Drug Deliv Rev., 2016, 1(101):89–98.
    CrossRef
  12. Pires, T. BlundellK, D. Ascher. pkCSM: Predicting Small-Molecule Pharmacokinetic and Toxicity Properties Using Graph-Based Signatures. J. Med. Chem., 2015, 58(9):4066–72.
    CrossRef
  13. Antoine, O. Michielin, V. Zoete. SwissADME: a free web tool to evaluate pharmacokinetics, drug-likeness and medicinal chemistry friendliness of small molecules. Scientific Reports. 2017, 7:1–13.
    CrossRef
  14. Dhayaney, G. Sibi. Pterocarpus Marsupium for the Treatment of Diabetes and Other Disorders. J Complement Med Alt Healthcare.,2019, 9(1):001-006.
    CrossRef
  15. Edwards, J. Aronson. Adverse drug reactions: definitions, diagnosis, and management. Lancet. 2000, 356(9237) 1255-1259.
    CrossRef
  16. Rudrapal, A. Issahaku, A. Bendale, A. Nagar. In silicoscreening of phytopolyphenolics for the identification of bioactive compounds as novel protease inhibitors effective against SARS-CoV-2. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn, 2022, 40(20):10437-10453.
    CrossRef
  17. Danao, D. Nandurkar, V. Rokde, R. Shivhare and U. Mahajan. Molecular Docking: Metamorphosis in Drug Discovery. Book title Molecular Docking – Recent Advances, 2022:1-27. DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.105972
    CrossRef
  18. Danao, V. Rokde , N. Bali  and U. Mahajan. The severity of COVID – 19 in Diabetes Patients, Curr Diabetes Rev., 2023, 19(5):1-6. doi: 10.2174/1573399819666221006103113.
    CrossRef
  19. Dar, S. Rafat , K. Dev , S. Abass , M. Khan, W. Abualsunun et al., Heartwood Extract of Pterocarpus marsupium Roxb. Offers Defense against Oxyradicals and Improves Glucose Uptake in HepG2 Cells. Metabolites, 2022, 12(10):947. doi: 10.3390/metabo12100947.
    CrossRef
  20. Sharma, A. Kar , S. Panda and D. Yadav. Co-administration of Pterocarpus marsupium Extract and Glibenclamide Exhibits Better Effects in Regulating Hyperglycemia and Associated Changes in Alloxan-induced Diabetic Mice. Curr Top Med Chem., 2022;22(32):2617-2628. doi: 10.2174/1568026623666221108125036.
    CrossRef
(Visited 419 times, 1 visits today)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.