<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>



<records>

  <record>
    <language>eng</language>
          <publisher>Oriental Scientific Publishing Company</publisher>
        <journalTitle>Biosciences Biotechnology Research Asia</journalTitle>
          <issn>0973-1245</issn>
            <publicationDate>2016-05-05</publicationDate>
    
        <volume>8</volume>
        <issue>1</issue>

 
    <startPage>289</startPage>
    <endPage>293</endPage>

	    <publisherRecordId>9354</publisherRecordId>
    <documentType>article</documentType>
    <title language="eng">A Comparative Study of Decalcification using three Different Agents and their Quantitative End-point Estimation</title>

    <authors>
	 


      <author>
       <name>Kamal Kiswani</name>

 
		
	<affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
      </author>
    

	 


      <author>
       <name>Ranjit Patil</name>


		
	<affiliationId>1</affiliationId>

      </author>
    

	

	


	


	
    </authors>
    
	    <affiliationsList>
	    
		
		<affiliationName affiliationId="1">M.D.S., Dev's Oral Care, Multispeciality Dental Clinic, Maharashtra (India).</affiliationName>
    

		
		<affiliationName affiliationId="2">Medical Biochemistry Department, Dr. Ulhas Patil Medical College, Jalgaon, Maharashtra (India).</affiliationName>
    
		
		
		
		
	  </affiliationsList>






    <abstract language="eng">The present study on decalcification includes following aims &amp; objectives: 1) To compare the efficacy of modified 5 % EDTA solution (neutralized with 2 % ammonium hydroxide) with routinely used 5 % HNO3 &amp; 5 % formic acid as decalcifying agents. 2) To quantitatively evaluate the optimum end-point with each of the above decalcifying agents &amp; the total time required for decalcification. 3) To recommend the best decalcifying agent and determine its optimum end-point. Total 90 samples were selected randomly from different patients, divided in slots of 30, with age group 13-20 years, independent of sex. Modified EDTA solution (neutralized with 2% ammonium hydroxide instead of sodium hydroxide) was found to be the most effective decalcifying agents as compared to 5 % HNO3 &amp; 5 % HCOOH. The decalcification time was considerably reduced (33-35 days). 5 % nitric acid was faster in its action (11-12 days) while 5 % formic acid was the intermediate one (16-18 days). The choice of decalcifying agent &amp; method preferably should be largely dictated by the urgency of procedure i.e. whether biopsy report is awaited by the surgeon or purpose of study, time, &amp; equipment available, etc. The method of end-point determination described in the study is a tool for quantitative evaluation of decalcification methods &amp; an objective assessment of the methods and/or tissue-specific factors. Decalcification of teeth is not dependent on the sex of patient, arch trait, &amp; type trait.</abstract>

    <fullTextUrl format="html">https://www.biotech-asia.org/vol8no1/a-comparative-study-of-decalcification-using-three-different-agents-and-their-quantitative-end-point-estimation/</fullTextUrl>



      <keywords language="eng">
        <keyword>Decalcification; 5 % HNO3; 5 % HCOOH; 5 % EDTA</keyword>
      </keywords>

  </record>
</records>