<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>



<records>

  <record>
    <language>eng</language>
          <publisher>Oriental Scientific Publishing Company</publisher>
        <journalTitle>Biosciences Biotechnology Research Asia</journalTitle>
          <issn>0973-1245</issn>
            <publicationDate>2016-06-25</publicationDate>
    
        <volume>13</volume>
        <issue>2</issue>

 
    <startPage>1171</startPage>
    <endPage>1175</endPage>

	 
      <doi>10.13005/bbra/2148</doi>
        <publisherRecordId>13939</publisherRecordId>
    <documentType>article</documentType>
    <title language="eng">Microencapsulation of Lactobacillus Sp. using Two Different Materials and Comparison for Encapsulation Efficiency</title>

    <authors>
	 


      <author>
       <name>V. Padhmavathi</name>

 
		
	<affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
      </author>
    

	 


      <author>
       <name>Radhakrishnan Preetha</name>


		
	<affiliationId>1</affiliationId>

      </author>
    

	

	


	


	
    </authors>
    
	    <affiliationsList>
	    
		
		<affiliationName affiliationId="1">Department of Food Process Engineering, SRM University, Kattankulathur, 603203</affiliationName>
    

		
		
		
		
		
	  </affiliationsList>






    <abstract language="eng">Probiotics  are microorganisms which, when taken orally, provide beneficial effects on human gut health. Microencapsulation of probiotics is a technique that is currently receiving considerable interest as it helps probiotics to survive against adverse environmental conditions in the human body. In this project , a study to determine the stronger encapsulating material is done by encapsulating Lactobacillus sp. using alginate and skim milk alginate. The encapsulation was done by extruding into 100mM CaCl<sub>2</sub> solution. Viability test, bile salt tolerance test and storage stability was performed. On analyzing the results it was found that, the skim milk alginate beads had the efficiency of 96.48%. The bacteria encapsulated using skim milk alginate was more viable and more tolerant towards bile salt. The storage stability test was carried out for a period of 28 days and it was found that the probiotic encapsulated using skim milk alginate were more viable. From the results it was concluded that skim milk alginate was a stronger encapsulating material than alginate because of the strong network forming nature of milk proteins.</abstract>

    <fullTextUrl format="html">https://www.biotech-asia.org/vol13no2/microencapsulation-of-lactobacillus-sp-using-two-different-materials-and-comparison-for-encapsulation-efficiency/</fullTextUrl>



      <keywords language="eng">
        <keyword>Probiotics; Lactobacillus sp; microencapsulation; alginate; skim milk</keyword>
      </keywords>

  </record>
</records>