Volume 7, number 1
 Views: (Visited 100 times, 1 visits today)    PDF Downloads: 909

Jain S. K, Manikpuri N, Kujur M, Antibacterial Activity of Seeds, Stems And Roots of Leea Aequata. Biosci Biotech Res Asia 2010;7(1)
Manuscript received on : August 02, 2008
Manuscript accepted on : September 13, 2008
Published online on:  --
How to Cite    |   Publication History    |   PlumX Article Matrix

Antibacterial Activity of Seeds, Stems And Roots of Leea Aequata

S. K. Jain1, N. Manikpuri1 and Manoj Kujur2

1Department of Chemistry, Government Nehru P.G.College, Burhar India.

2Department of Botany, Government Nehru P.G.College, Burhar India.

ABSTRACT: A vigorous search of medical plants during the last century has resulted in the discovery of huge number of plants which have been found to be of great use in the treatment of diseases and promotion of health. The medical plants have been under investigation and related compound which are mainly the products from above ground parts of seed plants are insufficiently explored for their Antibacterial activities. Recently some workers have demonstrated Antibacterila substances in some seed plants. The present investigation is a carried out to examine the Antibacterial activity of various successive extracts obtained from the stems and roots of leea aequata.

KEYWORDS: Antibacterial; Medicinal plants; Leea aequata; Microorganism.

Download this article as: 
Copy the following to cite this article:

Jain S. K, Manikpuri N, Kujur M, Antibacterial Activity of Seeds, Stems And Roots of Leea Aequata. Biosci Biotech Res Asia 2010;7(1)

Copy the following to cite this URL:

Jain S. K, Manikpuri N, Kujur M, Antibacterial Activity of Seeds, Stems And Roots of Leea Aequata. Biosci Biotech Res Asia 2010;7(1). Available from: https://www.biotech-asia.org/?p=9752

The medicinal plants have been under investigation and related compounds which are mainly the products from above ground parts of seed plants are insufficiently explored for their antimicrobial activities1-2. But still more investigations are needed because many of the micro-organisms are able to produce more potential antimicrobial substances like antibiotics. Recently some workers1-7 have demonstrated antimicrobial substances in some seed plants.

The micro organisms potentially pathogenic to man and animals can also survive saprophytically in nature, particularly in the habitats of man, animals and cultivated fields. It is now well established that the micro-organisms in all habitats live in an atmosphere of various organic compounds, which may be produced by themselves or by the decomposition of organic wastes. Further these natural products are known to play an important role against microorganisms. Most of these natural products belong to higher series of alcohols, aldehyde and acetylenic products8. Many of these substances are inhibitary rather than simulatory to micro-organisms9. The present investigation was carried out to examine the Antibacterial and antibacterial activity of various successive extracts obtained from the stems and roots of Leea aequata10-12.

Powdered (1 Kg.) seeds, stems and roots of Leea aequata were successively extracted with various solvents (1 litre) from non-polar i.e. petrolem ether, benzene, solvent ether, chloroform, acetone and alcohol in soxhlet apparatus for 30 hours. Then solvents were evaporated under reduced pressure and residues were redissolved in the same solvents (500 mg/ml) and used to study their antibacterial activity. The antibacterial activities were assayed following cups or well method as described by Vincent & Vincent14.

Culture Media

For antibacterial studies, the nutrient agar medium having the following composition was used :

  1. Beef extract                –           5.00 gms.
  2. Peptone                       –           5.00 gms.
  3. Agar                            –           20 gms.
  4. Sodium Chloride         –           5.00 gms.
  5. Distilled water             –           1000 ml.

Sterilization

The media and the slants for preparing for sub-cultures of organisms will be sterilized by autoclaving at 15 lbs. pressure for 30 minuts. The petri dishes were sterilized by keeping overnight in an electrically heated air over at 1400C.

Test Organisms

The following eight human and plant pathogenic bacteria were used for of the activity of successive seeds extractives.

Bacillus anthracis (+), Bacillus pumilis (+), Salmonella paratyphi (1st strain) (-), Salmonella paratyphi (II strain) (-), Staphylococus albus (+), X. compestria (-), X. malvacearum (1st strain) (-), X. malvacearum (II strain) (+).

Preparation of Agar Plate

Four percent (v/v) of the spore suspension of each organism will be mixed in sterilized nutrient agar medium, 20 ml. of this were poured in each sterilized petridish (90 mm diameter) and allowed to gel. After half an hour, cups or wells were made in agar plates as described by Vincent and Vincent (1944) and 0.02 ml. of sample extract was dispensed into the cups. In the same way controls were run with 500 ppm. solution of Acromycin and streptomycin against gram positive and gram negative bacteria respectively. The plates were then incubated at 32 + 10 C. for 12 hours and inhibition zones were measured. The experiment was run in triplicate and the data were recorded in Table 4-6.

Table 1: Antibacterial Activity of seeds of  Leea  aequata

S. No. Organism Diameter of growth of Inhibition (mm)

Including the Diameter of well (10 mm.).

Seeds  extracts in Different  solvents

                                                                                                 control

Pet. ether Benzene Solv. ether Chloroform Acetone Alcohol 500 ppm
1. Salmonella paratyphi

(1st strain) (-)

14 18 28
2. Salmonella paratyphi

(II strain) (-)

14 16 12 15 28
3. X. malvacearum (1st strain) (-) 22 17 16 24 18 28
4. X. malvacearum (II strain) (+) 20 15 12 18 16 30 28
5. Staphylococus albus (+) 18 14 16 15 22 22
6. X. compestria (-) 14 26
7. Bacillus

anthracis (+)

19 16 18 20 26 22 36
8. Bacillus

pumilis (+)

23 30 12 38 18 16 38

Table  2: Antibacterial Activity of stems of  Leea  aequata

S. No. Organism Diameter of growth of Inhibition (mm)

Including the Diameter of well (10 mm.).

Stems  extracts in Different  solvents

                                                                                                 control

Pet. ether Benzene Solv. ether Chloroform Acetone Alcohol 500 ppm
1. X. malvacearum (1st strain) (-) 12 12 16 16 56 24 28
2. X. malvacearum (II strain) (+) 12 14 15 12 16 18 28
3. Salmonella paratyphi

(1st strain) (-)

16 16 18 30 26 18 28
4. Salmonella paratyphi

(II strain) (-)

20 22 18 16 56 18 28
5. Staphylococus albus (+) 12 38 16 14 34 39 22
6. Bacillus

anthracis (+)

20 22 17 16 36 32 36
7. Bacillus

pumilis (+)

16 18 20 12 30 20 38
8. X. compestria (-) 14 16 12 12 18 26

Table 3: Antibacterial Activity of roots of  Leea  aequata.

S. No. Organism Diameter of growth of Inhibition (mm)

Including the Diameter of well (10 mm.).

Roots  extracts in Different  solvents

   control

Pet. ether Benzene Solv. ether Chloroform Acetone Alcohol 500 ppm
1. Salmonella paratyphi

(1st strain) (-)

15 16 21 20 28
2. Salmonella paratyphi

(II strain) (-)

37 12 18 19 28
3. Bacillus

anthracis (+)

28 13 14 21 15 18 36
4. Bacillus

pumilis

14 15 17 19 14 39 38
5. Staphylococus albus (+) 11 17 22
6. X. malvacearum (II strain) (+) 18 15 11 28
7. X. compestria (-) 13 15 16 23 26
8. X. malvacearum (1st strain) (-) 12 22 28

Critical  examination  of  the data   obtained  from  Antibacterial activity of  extracts  of  seeds ,  stems and   roots of  Leea aequata revealed that degree  of  activity depended  on the nature of the compounds present in them  and  their  capacity  of  diffusion  into agar medium . It has also been found that in nature the accumulation of various organic compounds during decomposition of organic matter, produced from plants by large number of microorganism, must the major factor for the inhibition of growth of these micro-organisms. Therefore the tested extracts showing adequate Antibacterial activity may be potentially explored as surface application for preventing dermal diseases caused by various fungi.

The perusal of data recorded in tables (1 to 3) revealed that activity of such successive extracts depends on the nature of their effective ingredients and their capacity of diffusion into agar medium. In the present experiment these extracts were found to be highly toxic against the test bacteria. It has been observed that bacteritoxicity in extracts of seeds is neither a generic nor a family character but it is due to the effective components contained in them and their nature against a particular micro organism. Such isolated substances from higher plants have also been found to possess systematic activity and less phytotoxicity as compared to other synthetic antimicrobial substances15-19. Strong bacteritoxicity of extract may be an account of isolation might prove of greater therapeutic value and may be explored in future for ameliorating human sufferings.

References 

  1. Jain, P. C. & Agrawal, S. C., Transmycol. Soc. Japan, 19, 293-297, (1978).
  2. Jain, P. C. & Agrawal, S. C., Transmycol. Soc. Japan, 19, 197-200, (1978).
  3. Bhatt, S. K. & Saxena, V. K., Indian Drugs, 17(8), 239-241, (1980).
  4. Rao, B. G. V. N., & Nigam, S. S., Flavour Industry, 1, 725, (1970).
  5. Bhatt, S. K. & Saxena, V. K., Indian Drugs & Pharmaceutical Industry, XV(5), 17 (1979).
  6. Rao, J. T., & Nigam, S. S., Riechstoffe Aroman, 1, 8-9 (1973).
  7. Nigam, S. S. & Ramaiah, M. Riechst Aroman Korperoflegem, 19(8), 337, (1969).
  8. Robinson, P. M., & Garett, M. K., Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc., 52, 293-299 (1977).
  9. Pathak, R. K. & Agarwal, S. C., Transmycol. Soc. Japan, 18, 298-301, (1977).
  10. Copra, R. N., Nayar, S. L. and Chopra, C., “Glossary of Indian Medicinal Plants”, C. S. I. R. Publication, page 151, New Delhi, (1956).
  11. Kirtikar, K. R. and Basu, B. D., “Indian Medicinal Plants”, Indian Press Publication, Vol. I, Page 620 (1933).
  12. “The Wealth of India Raw Materials”, C. S. I. R. Publications, Vol. VI, Page 56, (1962).
  13. Loo, Y. H., Sell, P. S., thomberry, H. H., Jon Enrilich Mc. Gwire, J. M. Savage, G. M. and Sylvester, J. C. J. Bact., 50, 701-708, (1948).
  14. Vincent, J. U. & Vincent, H. W., 1944, Filter paper disc. modification, of the Oxford Cup Penicillin determination, Proc. Soc. Expt. Biol., 55, (1962).
  15. Fawcett, C. H., Spencer, D. M., Ann. Rev. Phytopath., 8, 4.3-418, (1970).
  16. Raman, N., Gnanaguru, M. and Rajendran, V., Indian Drugs, Vol. 21, No. 31, pp. 598-560 (1992).
  17. Rawat, M.S.M., Purohit, M. C. and Pant, G., Fitoterapia, Vol, 13, No. 5, Page 461, (1992).
  18. Sankaranarayana, S. and Jolly, C. I., Indian Journal of Pharm. Sci., Vol.1, Page 6-13, (1993).
  19. Bonsignore, L., Artizzu, N., Cottiglia, F., and Loy, G., Fitoterapia, Vol. LXV, No. 2, page 174-176 (1996).
(Visited 100 times, 1 visits today)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.