Manuscript accepted on : 13-Sep-2018
Published online on: 05-10-2018
Plagiarism Check: Yes
1Biochemistry Department, Faculty of Science, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
2Cancer Metabolism and Epigenetics Unit, Faculty of Science, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
3Experimental Biochemistry Unit, King Fahd Medical Research Centre, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
4Cancer and Mutagenesis Unit, King Fahd Medical Research Centre, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Corresponding Author E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
ABSTRACT: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the major cancers that is characterized with high percentage of morbidity worldwide due to the advanced metastatic cancer that developed via acquired drug resistance mechanisms. Therefore, there is an urgent need to identify genetic variants in major genes that could contribute to the poor overall survival rate and drug-resistance. ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters are among the most studied genes that are related to the development of many cancers including CRC. In this study, three variants namely (G2168A and G3173A) in ABCC1 and (C421A) in ABCG2 were examined to evaluate their contribution to CRC in Saudi Arabia. DNA was extracted from the whole blood of 62 CRC patients and 100 controls. PCR-RFLP technique was used to identify the different genotypes among Saudi population. All statistical data were obtained by chi-square test and P values ˂0.05 were considered statistically significant. Interestingly, neither of the tested variants showed heterozygous nor homozygous distribution among the 162 samples. Therefore, those variants are rare in Saudi population and are not suspected to be involved in CRC pathogenesis. In conclusion, those variants cannot be used as diagnostic or prognostic markers for CRC in Saudi Arabia. However, more experiments need to be performed to confirm our findings.
KEYWORDS: Colorectal Cancer (CRC); Development Risk; Saudi Arabia; Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (Snps)Download this article as:
|Copy the following to cite this article:
Al-Doghaither H. A, Al-Ghafari A. B. Contribution of Genetic Variants of ABC Transporters (ABCC1 and ABCG2) Genes With the Pathogenesis of Colorectal Cancer. Biosci Biotech Res Asia 2018;15(3).
|Copy the following to cite this URL:
Al-Doghaither H. A, Al-Ghafari A. B. Contribution of Genetic Variants of ABC Transporters (ABCC1 and ABCG2) Genes With the Pathogenesis of Colorectal Cancer. Biosci Biotech Res Asia 2018;15(3). Available from: http://www.biotech-asia.org/?p=31058
Despite extensive and effective measures of preventive screening, as well as significant advances in treatment options, colorectal cancer (CRC) remains one of the most widespread and fatal cancers in both men and women worldwide. Based on the latest statistical analysis report, CRC considered the third most common malignancy and the fourth leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, as 1,400,000 new cases are diagnosed yearly and about 700,000 deaths occur.1 In Saudi Arabia, according to the analysis report from National cancer registry (NCR), it ranks the first and the third most common cancers among males and females, respectively.2 Because CRC patients often have symptoms in the early stage of the disease, the diagnosis at this stage represents an important clinical challenge as it might increase the response of the patients to the currently used treatments and therefore, their survival rates. The identification of the role of genetic variants in major genes that usually expressed highly in cancer patients are among the most recently diagnostic methods.
ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters are major proteins that play several important physiological functions. They act as exporters and importers for several natural and chemical molecules. There are 49 proteins identified in human, 14 of which are associated with various diseases. They are classified into seven subgroups named ABCA to ABCG depending on amino acid sequences.3,4,5 In cancer research, three major ABC transporters (ABCB1, ABCC1, and ABCG2) are widely studied for their contribution to the tumorigenesis of many cancers.
Multidrug resistance-associated protein 1 (MRP1/ABCC1) is the first identified member of ABCC subfamily, which belongs to ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter superfamily.6,7 Subsequent studies revealed the mechanism of MRP1/ABCC1 as an exporter of drugs and metabolites in many physiological, pathological and pharmacological processes.8 MRP1/ABCC1 gene is located on chromosome 16p13.1 and spans 531 amino acid residues with an apparent molecular weight of 180-190kD.6 With the advance in sequencing technology, many ABCC1 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and common haplotypes were identified in different human populations. On the other hand, breast cancer resistant protein (BCRP/ABCG2) belongs to the G-subfamily of the ABC transporters. This transporter is able to transport different compounds across cellular membranes, therefore, it plays an important protection role against many toxins. It is located on chromosome 4q22, and encodes a half-transporter that contains 655 amino acid polypeptide. Besides the expression of ABCG2 in human cell lines from breast, colon, ovary, and gastric cancer, the distribution of ABCG2 has been located in human colon, small intestine, heart and brain.9 Therefore, this research was interested in finding the role of genetic variants in ABCC1 and ABCG2 genes, particularly, SNPs G2168A and G3173A in ABCC1 gene as well as SNP C421A in ABCG2 gene, on the pathogenesis of CRC in Saudi patients as less is known about their correlations with CRC.
Materials and Methods
QIAamp DNA Blood Mini Kit (catalog number: 51106, QIAGEN Inc., USA). QIAGEN HotStarTaq Master Mix Kit (catalog number: 203601, Valencia, CA, USA). Restriction enzyme Hin4I (catalog number: ER1601, Fermentas, USA). Restriction enzyme BstEII (catalog number: R0162S, NEB, USA). Restriction enzyme HpyCH4III (catalog number: R0618S, NEB, USA). Thermo Scientific GeneRuler 100 bp DNA ladder (catalog number: SM0243, ThermoFisher Scientific, USA).
Subjects and Samples
In this study, 62 CRC patients and 100 healthy controls were involved. The purpose of the research was explained and a written consent of the participants as well as their answers on a questionnaire were obtained to be involved in the study. The General Directorate of Health Affairs in Jeddah and the unit of biomedical ethics at KAU Faculty of Medicine approved this study. Whole blood samples were drawn into (EDTA) lavender top vacutainers. All samples were collected from CRC patients and controls who were routinely visiting the oncology centers and blood bank units at King Abdullah Medical city, King Abdulaziz University Hospital (KAUH) and King Fahad General Hospital in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
DNA Extraction and Genotyping of SNPs
Genomic deoxyribonucleic acid (gDNA) was extracted from peripheral blood leukocytes in whole blood samples using QIAamp DNA Mini Kit following the manufacturer’s instructions. The DNA concentration was determined by reading the absorbance at a wavelength of 260 nm using the Thermo Scientific NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer. Purity was determined by calculating the ratio of absorbance at 260/280 nm and 260/230 nm. Then, PCR was used to amplify the different regions that contains the desired SNPs in both genes. For a 25µl PCR reaction, 1µl genomic DNA (100 ng/µl), 12.5µl HotStarTaq Master Mix, 9.5µl RNase free water, and 1µl of each forward and reverse primer (Table 1) were used. The PCR thermocycler program was as follow: initial denaturation was done at 95˚C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 95˚C for 1 min, annealing at 64, 60, and 62˚C for 1 min for SNPs G2168A, G3173A, and C421A, respectively, extension at 72˚C for 1 min, and a final extension at 72˚C for 5 min. PCR products were run on 1.5% agarose gel to determine the amplification. Then, all amplified PCR products were treated with the different endonucleases following the manufacturer’s instructions to reveal the different genotypes with restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis (Table 2).
Table 1: Primers sequence and PCR product sizes used for detection of ABCC1 and ABCG2 SNPs.
|SNP ID||Primers||PCR products sizes|
Table 2: Genotypes length after treatment with endonucleases.
|SNP ID||Restriction enzyme||Length after RFLP|
|Hin4I||Major allele: 320, 128, 96, and 45 bp
Minor allele: 448, 96, and 45 bp
|BstEII||Major allele: 272 and 194 bp
Minor allele: 466 bp
|HpyCH4III||Major allele: 376, 88, 87, 66, and 17 bp
Minor allele: 393, 88, 87, and 66 bp
*RFLP; restriction fragments length polymorphism
A Chi-square (χ2) test was used to calculate the allele frequency and the genotype distribution of each variant with that expected for a population in Hardy- Weinberg equilibrium. P values of <0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Genotypes Distribution of ABCC1 and ABCG2 SNPs
The genotype and allele frequencies of the three SNPs in ABCC1 and ABCG2 genes were examined by RFLP for all subjects (n=162). Interestingly, the results showed 100% normal genotype in both patients and controls. The two other genotypes; heterozygous and homozygous were not detected in all patients and controls which indicates that our population are under Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium assumption (P>0.05) and the rarity of those SNPs in Saudi population.
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most commonly diagnosed cancers world wide. Chemotherapy is the one of most common treatment regimen for CRC, but tumor resistance causes its failure.10,11 The more common causes of resistance for chemotherapies is the increased expression of ABC transporters such as ABCC1 and ABCG2. In this study, the genotype distribution of three major SNPs in ABCC1 (G2168A and G3173A) and ABCG2 (C421A) were examined to evaluate their contribution to CRC risk in Saudi Arabia. Interestingly, all tested SNPs showed non-significant correlation to CRC risk as they were all normally distributed as shown by chi-square analysis test. Single nucleotide polymorphisms in the ABCC1 and ABCG2 genes were found to change the expression and activity of the corresponding gene and its product. Therefore, they may increase the risk and affect the response of the cancers cells to the therapy and result in increased susceptibility to different types of cancers.12,13 The exact effect of these variants is inconsistent which make it difficult to conclude the exact role of these variants in cancers. The SNPs G2168A and G3173A in ABCC1 genes have been studied in many diseases and to lesser extent in cancers. In most of these studies, they were interested in determining their role in drug resistance more than their ability to increase the risk of the disease. Therefore, it was difficult to compare our results with the published results. Regarding SNP C421A, less publications were found that conclude the correlation between this SNP with the risk of many cancers. In contrast to our finding, Wu and his team found that carriers with ABCG2 G34A A allele and C421A A allele and haplotype G34A A-C421A C or G34A G-C421A A were significantly associated with the increased breast carcinoma risk.14 The variant 421C>A or 34G>A was associated with an increased incidence risk of diffuse large B- cell lymphoma (DLBCL).15 However, the 421C>A allele was reported to decrease risk for renal cell carcinoma14 and cannot be used as a marker for the gefitinib-toxicity in non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC).16 Moreover, Li et al., (2017) found that Chinese breast cancers patients with normal genotype for SNP 421 CC in ABCG2 genes had increase progression-free survival (PFS).17
In conclusion, the current study to the best of our knowledge, is the first study that correlates variants in ABCC1 and ABCG2 genes with the risk of CRC in Saudi Arabia. The three studied variants showed normal genotypes distribution among Saudi population and therefore did not show a high risk for CRC development or pathogenes is. However, this study needs to be done on a larger population size and to be performed on tissue samples to confirm the findings and to elucidate the possible mechanisms behind the protective role.
The research team would like to express their gratitude for King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology (KACST), Riyadh, KSA for their financial support to the research project number (LGP-36-15).
Conflict of Interest
There is no conflict of interest.
- Gandomani H., Yousefi S., Aghajani M., Mohammadian-Hafshejani A., Tarazoj A., Pouyesh V., Salehiniya H. Colorectal cancer in the world: incidence, mortality and risk factors. Biomedical Research and Therapy. 2017;4(10):1656-1675.
- Saudi Cancer Registry. Cancer Incidence Report Saudi Arabia. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Ministry of Health. 2015.
- Schumacher T., Krohn M., Hofrichter J., Lange C., Stenzel J., Steffen J., Dunkelmann T., Paarmann K., Fröhlich C., Uecker A., Plath A. S., Sommer A., Brüning T., Heinze H. J., Pahnke J. ABC transporters B1, C1 and G2 differentially regulate neurore generation in mice. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(4):e35613.
- Housman G., Byler S., Heerboth S., Lapinska K., Longacre M., Snyder N., Sarkar S. Drug resistance in cancer an overview. Cancers. 2014;6(3):1769-1792.
- Mo L., Pospichalova V., Huang Z., Murphy S., Payne S., Wang F., Kennedy M., Cianciolo G., Bryja V., Pizzo S., Bachelder R. Ascites increases expression function of multi drug resistance proteins in ovarian cancer cells. Plos One. 2015;10(7):e0131579.
- Yin J., Zhang J. Multi drug resistance-associated protein 1 (MRP1/ABCC1) polymorphism from discovery to clinical application. Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2011;36(10):927-938.
- Yin J., Huang Q., Yang Y., Zhang J., Zhong M., Zhou H., Liu Z. Characterization and analyses of multidrug resistance-associated protein 1 (MRP1/ABCC1) polymorphisms in Chinese population. Pharmacogenetics and Genomics. 2009;19(3):206-216.
- Kunická T., Souček, P. Importance of ABCC 1 for cancer therapy and prognosis. Drug Metabolism Reviews. 2014;46(3):325-342.
- Meissner K., Heydrich B., Jedlitschky G., Schwabedissen H., Mosyagin I., Dazert P., Eckel L., Vogelgesang S., Warzok R., Bȍhm, M., Lehmann C., Wendt M., Cascorbi I., Kroemer H. The ATP-binding cassette transporter ABCG2 (BCRP) a marker for side population stem cells, is expressed in human heart. Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry. 2006;54(2):215-221.
- Mazard T., Causse A., Simony J., Leconet W., Vezzio-Vie N., Torro A., Jarlier M., Evrard A., Rio D. M., Assenat E., Martineau P., Ychou M., Robert B., Gongora C. Sorafenib overcomes irinotecan resistance in colorectal cancer by inhibiting the ABCG2 drug-efflux pump. Molecular Cancer Therapeutics. 2013;12(10):2121-2134.
- Nagheh Z., Irani S., Mirfakhraie R., Dinarvand R. SN38-PEG-PLGA verapamil nano particles inhibit proliferation and down regulate drug transporter ABCG 2 gene expression in colorectal cancer cells. Progress in Biomaterials. 2017;6(4):137-145.
- Campa D., Müller P., Edler L., Knoefel L., Barale R., Heussel C., Thomas M., Canzian F., Risch A. A comprehensive study of polymorphisms in ABCB1, ABCC2 and ABCG2 and lung cancer chemotherapy response and prognosis. International Journal of Cancer. 2012;131(12):2920-2928.
- Campa D., Pardini B., Naccarati A., Vodickova L., Novotny J., Forsti A., Hemminki K., Barale R., Vodicka P., Canzian F. A gene-wide investigation on polymorphisms in the ABCG2/BRCP transporter and susceptibility to colorectal cancer. Mutation Research-Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis. 2008;645(1–2):56-60.
- Wu H., Liu Y., Kang H., Xiao Q., Yao W., Zhao H., Wang E., Wei M. Genetic variations in ABCG2 gene predict breast carcinoma susceptibility and clinical outcomes after treatment with anthracycline-based chemotherapy. BioMed Research International. 2015;2015:1-12.
- Natarajan K., Xie Y., Baer M., Ross D. Role of breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP/ABCG2) in cancer drug resistance. Biochemical Pharmacology. 2013;83(8):1084-1103.
- Tang L., Zhang C., He H., Pan Z., Fan D., He Y., You H., Li Y. Associations between ABCG2 gene polymorphisms and gefitinib toxicity in non-small cell lung cancer a meta-analysis. Onco Targets and Therapy. 2018;11:665-675.
- Li W., Zhang D., Du F., Xing X., Wu Y., Liang M., Fan Z., Zhao P., Liu T., Li G. ABCB 1 3435 T T and ABCG 2 421 CC geno types were significantly associated with longer progression-free survival in Chinese breast cancer patients. Oncotarget. 2017;8(67):111041-111052.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.