Volume 13, number 2
 Views: (Visited 386 times, 1 visits today)    PDF Downloads: 452

Gharehkhani E. Preparation and Characterization of Some Magnetic Nanocomposites of Biodegradable Polyurethane Based on (S)-Histidine. Biosci Biotech Res Asia 2016;13(2)
Manuscript received on : 10 April 2016
Manuscript accepted on : 07 June 2016
Published online on:  --
How to Cite    |   Publication History    |   PlumX Article Matrix

Preparation and Characterization of Some Magnetic Nanocomposites of Biodegradable Polyurethane Based on (S)-Histidine

Elaheh Gharehkhani

Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Engineering, Islamic Azad University, Saveh Branch, Saveh, Iran. Corresponding Author Email : e.gharehkhani@iau-saveh.ac.ir

DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.13005/bbra/2128

ABSTRACT: Recycling the polymeric materials into the cycle of nature is one of the concerns of scientists; this has been possible through using natural or synthetic polymers. In this study, new polyurethanes containing optically active monomers and ester linkages were developed by prepolymer method. Nano zero valent iron (ZVI) particles that were synthesized by co-precipitation method, were well dispersed in the polymeric matrix with different percentage amounts in the presence of the ionic liquid via in-situ polymerization technique. The accuracy of monomer synthesis, all prepolymers and polyurethanes was confirmed by typical spectroscopy techniques of FTIR, 1HNMR, and CHN-O elemental analysis. To study the quality of ZVI and nanocomposites, nanoparticles (NPs) distribution instrument of X-ray (XRD), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) were used. Properties such as thermal stability and thermal behavior and magnetic field were examined respectively by TGA, DTG, DSC and VSM techniques. Hydrolytic and enzymatic degradation of polyurethane composites with different weight percentages of Fe3O4 were studied.

KEYWORDS: biodegradable; polyurethane; magnetic, nanocomposite

Download this article as: 
Copy the following to cite this article:

Gharehkhani E. Preparation and Characterization of Some Magnetic Nanocomposites of Biodegradable Polyurethane Based on (S)-Histidine. Biosci Biotech Res Asia 2016;13(2)

Copy the following to cite this URL:

Gharehkhani E. Preparation and Characterization of Some Magnetic Nanocomposites of Biodegradable Polyurethane Based on (S)-Histidine. Biosci Biotech Res Asia 2016;13(2).Available from: http://www.biotech-asia.org/?p=14029

Introduction

Polyurethanes are versatile polymers made of very soft foams to hard elastomers and, durable coatings in applications as diverse as medical, pharmaceutical, paint and coating industries [1]. From the reaction of Diisocyanate with diacids and polyols, they are easily prepared in a polyaddition reaction. Polyester-polyols or polyether-polyols with different aliphatic and aromatic structures are synthesized for this purpose [2]. Generally, the structure-property relationships in a Polymer chain with its final characteristics is confirmed [3]. Depending on the type of requirements and the usages of special soft [4] or hard [5] segments, optically active side branches [6], ether bonds [7], ester [8 and 9], amide and imide [10] functional groups are used to solve some polyurethane difficulties such as low thermal stability and poor mechanical strength [11]. With the increasing free spin rotation of polymer chains, ether links make them more flexible. By creating hydrogen bonds through amide groups, increase the solubility of the product [12]. Also the repetition of amide groups and the heterocyclic rings in polymer chains, improve the heat resistance of the polymers [13]. The presence of ester bonds in the polyurethane’s structure increases the likelihood of hydrolytic degradation in esterase [14]. Not returning to the cycle of nature is one of the issues that synthetic polymers are faced with. Natural polysaccharide-based biodegradable polymers such as chitosan and alginate [15], although are used in the food and pharmaceutical industries, do not have the durability and thermal stability. Due to their potential applications in fields related to human life such as health and environmental protection, biodegradable polymers, in the last twenty years, have been regarded by researchers. Using biocompatible amino acid groups in the polymer chain structure, increases the solubility and causes the development of the applications as drug delivery agents [16], detection of chiral and isolation of enantiomers in stationary phase of chromatography [17], asymmetric synthesis catalyst, absorbent metal ions and biomaterials [18]. In an efficient way, the structure of optically active amino acids is entered into chemical structures of diol or dacid and used as a monomer to prepare polymers [19-23]. It is expected that such synthetic polymers based on amino acids, are biocompatible and biodegradable. Invasion of microorganisms and fungi in soil and water of the sea or in the presence of esterase enzymes in in-vitro conditions has shown that the polyester-polyurethane compared with polyether-polyurethanes have greater biodegradability [24-29]. In addition to the structural modification of polyurethane chain, we can use inorganic nanoparticles, such as metal oxides, for example TiO2 [30], ZnO [31], SiO2 [32] and Fe3O4 [33-35] to improve the required features. For example, the nanoparticle of zero-valent iron oxide (ZVI), although is now investigated in many articles, the application of it is regarded. Recently magnetic composite of polyurethane / Fe3O4 are produced and in some of them nanoparticles of Fe3O4 are used without surface modification and emulsifier capacity. Such as the research of xu and et.al [36] as well as Guo and et.al who developed polyurethane magnetic composites as microwave absorbers [37]. Surface modification of Fe3O4 nanoparticles with thiacalix [4] arenes (TC4As) [38] or TDGA have been reported by Mohammadi and et.al. They state that nanocomposites based on polyurethane with a more appropriate distribution of magnetic nanoparticles are biocompatible and non-toxic, so they are a good candidate for being used in biomedical applications [39]. In a study, covered Fe3O4 nanoparticles with bamboo carbon were used to destruct the quinoline in the treatment of a wastewater through “immobilized cell” method [40]. In another article magnetic nanoparticles coated with polyurethane are employed as a carrier immobilized microorganism for removing toluene and phenol from wastewater in a treatment. The magnetic field causes the degradation of phenol by accelerating the growth of microorganisms. Weak magnetic fields can stimulate bacterial growth effectively, shorten the cycle of growth and increase the activity of microorganisms that are useful for reproduction and metabolism [41]. In this paper, some new biodegradable polyurethane nanocomposites were prepared. With an optically active monomer based on (s)- histidine, some optically active polyester-polyurethane containing amide groups were prepared and then Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles in different weight ratio dispersed in the polyurethane chains using ionic liquid. The accuracy of synthesis, thermal and magnetic properties, and biodegradability of nanocomposites were investigated.

Experimental

Materials

N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP; 99.5%), triphenyl phosphite (TPP; 98%), (s)-histidine monohydrochloride monohydrate (98%), and absolute ethanol (99%), methanol (98%), pyridine (py, 99%), 4,4’-Methylene-bis-(4- phenylisocyanate) MDI, Hexamethylene diisocyanate (HDI, 99%), calcium chloride, dibutyltin dilurate (DBTD, 97%), ethylene glycol (EG), hydroquinone (HQ), terephthaloyl dichloride (TPC, 98%), dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO), N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF), FeSO4.7H2O, and FeCl3.6H2O salts were obtained from Merck Co. Tosyl chloride (Aldrich, 99%), adipoyl chloride (Aldrich, 98%), and 1,2,4-benzenetricarboxylic acid 1,2-anhydride (TMA; 98%) was purified by recrystallization from the mixture of acetic anhydride and acetic acid (1:5). N,N-Dimethylacetamide (DMAc) was purified by distillation under reduced pressure over barium oxide prior to polymerization. The other materials were used as obtained without further purification.

Techniques

Infrared measurements were performed on a Bruker-IFS48 FTIR spectrometer (Ettlingen, Germany). The spectra of solids were carried out using KBr pellet. Vibrational transition frequencies are reported in wave numbers (cm-1). Band intensities are assigned as weak (w), medium (m), shoulder (sh), strong (s) and broad (br). Proton nuclear magnetic resonance 1H NMR (500 MHz) spectra were recorded in DMSO-d6 solution using a Bruker Avance 500 (GmbH, Germany). Tetramethyl silane (TMS) was used as an internal reference. Multiplicities of proton resonance are designated as singlet (s), doublet (d), doublet of doublet (dd) and multiplet (m). Elemental analyses were perfumed by a CHN-O Rapid Heraeus elemental analyzer (Wellesley‚ MA). Inherent viscosities were measured by a standard procedure using a Cannon Fenske Routine Viscometer (Germany) at a concentration of 0.5 g dL-1 in NMP at 30°C. Differential scanning calorimetric (DSC) and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) were recorded in nitrogen atmosphere at a heating rate of 30°C/min on a Stanton Redcraft STA-780 (London, UK). Specific rotations were measured by a Perkin Elmer-241 Polarimeter (Germany). Wide angle X-ray diffraction patterns (XRD) were performed at room temperature on an X-ray diffractometer (Siemens model D 5000, Germany) using Ni-filtered CuKα radiation (40 kV, 25 mA) with scanning rate of 3°/min. The morphology of the polyurethane (PU)/Fe3O4 nanocomposites powders during milling was investigated by means of scanning electron microscopy (SEM; Philips, XL30) on gold-coated powders. The magnetic properties of Fe3O4 nanoparticles and composites were studied with Vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM) by Central Laboratory of kashan university (Isfahan-Iran).

Methods

Preparation of magnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles

The typical synthesis procedure of Fe3O4 nanoparticles is similar to the method described in [41]. Twenty grams NaOH was dissolved in 250 mL deionized water which was deoxygenated by bubbling N2 gas for 30 min at 1,000g stirring for 10 min. In another beaker, 0.85 mL of 12.1 N HCl and 25 mL deionized water was mixed, and then 8.1 g of FeCl3.6H2O and 3.1 g of FeSO4.7H2O were successively dissolved in the solution under stirring. Then, the resultant solution was added drop-wise into the above-mentioned NaOH solution under vigorous stirring, and black precipitate was obtained and harvested by centrifugation, and then washed with deionized water and ethanol several times, respectively, and finally dried in the air at 80 C for 2 h. Then, the harvested Fe3O4 nanoparticle composite was used for the next step in the preparation of the magnetic PU/Fe3O4 composites.

Synthesis of diacids

In this step first, 0.351 g of (s)-histidine (2 mmol) were stirred in 8 ml of NMP at 0 ᵒC for 30 minutes. A 50 mL, two-necked, round-bottomed flask equipped with a magnetic stirrer, nitrogen gas inlet tube, and calcium chloride drying tube was charged with the mixture. Then about 1.0 mL of propylene oxide was added, and after a few minutes 0.183 g of adipoyl chloride (1 mmol) was added. The temperature was raised to room temperature and the solution was continuously stirred for 6 hrs. Polyamide was precipitated by pouring the flask content into methanol. Then it was filtered, washed with hot water and methanol and dried overnight under vacuum at 100 °C. (Terephthaloyl chloride was used in the same way.) Two types of diacid as chain extender were prepared in this step. The yield of APC diacid 84.5% and TPC diacid 95.0%, and their specific optical rotations, [α] 25 D : -78.6 and -55.9 [0.0520 g and 0.0500 g in 10 mL of DMF] were obtained.

Synthesis of polyester-polyols

To prepare the polyester – polyol oligomers or diol containing ester linkages, first, the catalytic solution contains 1.068 g (5.6 mmol) of tosyl chloride in 2 ml of pyridine was stirred for half an hour and then 2 ml of DMF as solvent was added to the mixture. In a case that EG was used in diol synthesis, 0.744 g (1.2 mmol) of ethylene glycol and to provide diol solution with HQ, 0.132 g (1.2 mmol) of hydroquinone, were dissolved in 1 ml of pyridine. To prepare the solution of dicarboxylic acid, 0.548 g (1 mmol) of the synthesized diacid in the previous step was dissolved in 4.5 ml of DMF. Finally, the acid solution was poured in a 50 ml, two-necked, round-bottomed flask equipped with a magnetic stirrer, nitrogen gas inlet tube, and condenser, and then catalyst solution was gradually added within 20 minutes to the flask solution. The diol solution was then added to the mixture and stirred for half an hour. Then, the temperature was increased to 120 ᵒC and stirred at this temperature for 2 hours continuously. The resulting product was work up with pouring in to 50 ml of water and methanol (1:1) and stirring for 15 minutes. Finally, the resulting precipitates filtered, washed with water and then dried for 2 hours at 80 ᵒC in a vacuum oven. Four different kinds of polyester-polyols were synthesized in the same way.

Synthesis of polyurethanes

At each batch, a solution of 0.1 mmol of polyester-polyol derived from the previous step with 0.025 g (0.1 mmol) of MDI or 0.017 g (0.1 mmol) of HDI in 1 ml of NMP as solvent was prepared and 0.01 grams of catalyst (DBTD) was added to the mixture then, mixed for 30 minutes at room temperature. The temperature gradually increased to 110 ᵒC and the reaction was completed in 7 hours. The resulting mixture was cooled and was poured in 100 ml of water. So polymer precipitates were isolated in water and separated. Finally, they dried at 90 ᵒC in the vacuum oven. Generally, 8 samples of polyurethanes were prepared this way.

Preparation of polyurethane/Fe3O4 nanocomposites  

According to the yield at each batch, the required amounts of raw materials, solvents and catalyst for preparing one grams of polyurethane were calculated. Before curing stage, using catalyst, the amount 0.1 g of synthesized Fe3O4 nanoparticles and 0.1 g of ethyl methyl imidazolium bromide ionic liquid; [emim]Br were added to the solution and distributed by sonication method. Therefore, NPs in the in-situ polymerization were entrapped between the polymer chains during the polymerization to form a desirable composite. All nanocomposites were fine synthesized in the same way with different weight percentages up to 30% of NPs in the polymeric matrix.

Results and Discussion

Optically active co-poly(ester amide urethane)s were prepared in three stages from chemical reactions. Two new optically active acids were synthesized from the reaction of (s)-histidine with adipoyl chloride or, terephthaloyl chloride in 1:1 molar ratio. Calcium chloride as water absorbent and propylene oxide as acid scavenger are used. Amide bonds were formed at this reaction step. Imidazolium side branch as polar heterocyclic rings and amide bonds are the advantages of this design of diacid, addition to the optically active properties.

Characterization of diacids

In Figure 1 the FT-IR spectra of optically active diacid based on APC are shown. Peaks in the range of 3410-2925 cm-1 are related to the C-H bond stretching frequency, peaks in the range of  2345 cm-1 to amide N-H stretching frequencies, spectrum in 1620 cm-1  to the frequency of the aromatic C=C bond stretching and district peak in 1683 cm-1 can be attributed to stretching and amide and acid carbonyl groups. Peaks in the range of 1150-1008 cm-1 can be assigned to the aliphatic C-C bonds and C-H stretching frequencies.

Figure 1: FT-IR spectrum of optically active diacid based on APC Figure 1: FT-IR spectrum of optically active diacid based on APC

Click here to View figure

The nuclear magnetic resonance spectrum (1H-NMR) of optically active diacid (APC) can be seen in Figure 2. As it shown, amine hydrogen (N-H) and C-H bond between two second types of amines in (s)-histidine around 8.3 and 8.4 ppm, it’s aromatic hydrogen in 7.4 ppm, optically active C-H bond in 5 ppm, mythylene (CH2) histidine in range of 3.4 and 3.5 are located. Peaks related to hydrogen nuclear magnetic resonance of aliphatic methylene groups have appeared on the lower fields, in the range of 1 and 1.7 ppm.

Figure 2: 1H-NMR spectrum of optically active diacid based on APC Figure 2: 1H-NMR spectrum of optically active diacid based on APC

Click here to View figure

 

Table 1: Characterization of diacids

Diacid Type Formula FT-IR (cm-1) 1H-NMR Elemental analysis
[Mw] Found Calcd.
APC C18H24N6O6 C: 51.38 C: 51.43
[420] 3410-3607 (O-H) acid, 1.35 dd (4H, CH2); h H: 5.70 H: 5.71
2925- 3410 (C-H), 1.87 d (4H, CH2); g N: 19.89 N: 20.00
2345 (-NH-) amide & imidazolium, 3.50 dd (4H, CH2); f
1683 (C=O) acid, 5.12 d (2H, CH); e
1620 (C=C) arom. & (C=O) amide, 7.52 d (2H, aromatic);d
1150 -1095 (C-H) aliph. 8.28 s (2H, N-H aromatic); c
1008 (C-C) aliph. 8.54 dd (2H, arom.);b
8 14.31 s (2H, acid); a
8
TPC C20H20N6O6 C: 54.50 C: 54.54
[440] 3560 (O-H) acid, 3.52 dd (4H, CH2); g H: 4.52 H: 4.54
3000- 3410 (C-H), 5.25 d (2H, CH); f N: 19.01 N: 19.09
2235 (-NH-) amide & imidazolium, 7.60 d (2H, aromatic);e
1600 (C=O) acid, 7.87 s (4H, benzene);d
1575 (C=C) aromatic & (C=O) amide, 8.35 s (2H, N-H aromatic); c
1165 (C-H) aliphatic 8.67 dd (2H, arom.);b
1005 (C-C) aliphatic 14.31 s (2H, acid); a
8

Characterization of prepolymers

The reaction of an optically active diacid obtained from the previous step with one of two commercial diols, EG and HQ when the molar ratio of alcohol is higher than the diacid, causes to prepare some new diols, polyols and hydroxyl end groups oligomers. Ester bonds were formed at this step (figure 3).

Figure 3: Synthesis of polyester-polyols Figure 3: Synthesis of polyester-polyols

Click here to View figure

 

CHN-O elemental analysis of two kinds of diacid, four types of diols and eight samples of polyurethanes which confirm validity of their synthesis were shown in Tables 1 and 2. Polyurethanes containing amide and ester groups, and imidazolium side branches were synthesized by the reaction of the prepared prepolymers with commercial diisocyanates, HDI and MDI in the presence of a DBTD as catalyst and the gradual elimination remove of water.

Figure:4 Synthesis of poly(ester-amide-urethane)s Figure:4 Synthesis of poly(ester-amide-urethane)s

Click here to View figure

Table 2: Characterization of diols and polyurethanes

Comp. Code Formula Mw Type Elemental analysis
C (%) H (%) N (%)
Diol APC-EG C22H32N6O8 508 Calcd. 51.97 6.30 16.53
Found 51.90 6.21 16.50
APC-HQ C30H32N6O8 604 Calcd. 59.60 5.30 13.91
Found 59.71 5.35 14.01
TPC-EG C24H28N6O8 528 Calcd. 54.54 5.30 15.91
Found 54.49 5.25 16.00
TPC-HQ C32H28N6O8 624 Calcd. 61.54 4.49 13.46
Found 61.60 4.46 13.30
Polymer APC-EG-HDI C30H42N8O10 674 Calcd. 53.41 6.23 16.62
Found 54.01 6.15 17.33
APC-EG-MDI C37H40N8O10 756 Calcd. 58.73 5.29 14.81
Found 60.00 5.30 15.02
APC-HQ-HDI C38H42N8O10 770 Calcd. 59.22 5.45 14.54
Found 60.08 5.42 14.53
APC-HQ-MDI C45H40N8O10 852 Calcd. 63.38 4.69 13.14
Found 63.45 4.65 13.11
TPC-EG-HD C32H38N8O10 694 Calcd. 55.33 5.48 16.14
Found 55.28 5.43 16.02
TPC-EG-MDI C39H36N8O10 776 Calcd. 60.31 4.64 14.43
Found 60.51 4.66 14.62
TPC-HQ-HDI C40H38N8O10 790 Calcd. 60.76 4.81 14.18
Found 60.78 4.84 14.08
TPC-HQ-MDI C47H36N8O10 872 Calcd. 64.68 4.13 12.82
Found 64.50 4.30 12.49

 

Characterization of polyurethanes (PUs)

FTIR, 1H-NMR spectra, and elemental analysis of PUs

The resulting PUs were characterized by FTIR, 1H-NMR and elemental analysis techniques. The data were shown in Table (2) and figure (5). All the polymers showed two almost broad characteristic FTIR absorption peaks at about 3050-3420 cm-1 related to amide N-H bands, and 1648- 1661 cm-1 corresponding to the amide carbonyl and ester groups. It showed be mention that the broadness of peaks was attributed to the preformed amide units and also polyamide backbones. The representative FTIR spectra of TPC-EG-HDI PU were brought in Figure 5. Not so broad peak in the area 3403 cm-1, secondary amines N-H stretching frequency in the structure of histidine, peaks in the frequency range of 3403-2923 cm-1 tensile C-H bond, peaks in the range of 2300 Cm-1 stretching frequencies N-H amide, peak in an area 1600 Cm-1 is related to stretching frequency of the aromatic C=C bond stretching, amide carbonyl groups, created peak in area 1775 Cm-1 is attributed to the ester carbonyl, and peaks in the range of 1244-1009 cm-1 return to stretching frequency of the aliphatic C-C and C-H bonds in ethylene and adipoyl. The absence of sharp peaks in the area 2270 cm-1, the stretching frequency of NCO indicates the purity of polyurethane without diisocyanate as raw material. Presence of a peak in the area 1718 cm-1, related to tensile frequency of polyurethane carbonyl groups proves the synthesis accuracy of the polymer.

The 1H-NMR of TPC-EG-HDI PU showed peaks in the region of δ = 7.55-8.79 ppm related to aromatic rings, and peaks for two kinds of amide and urethane NH groups appeared as singlet at δ = 10.57 and 10.28 ppm. The other polymers showed similar peaks in the 1H-NMR spectra with differences in aromatic and aliphatic proton magnetic resonance fields. The elemental analysis results were in good agreement with calculated percentages for carbon, hydrogen and nitrogen contents in poly(ester-amide-urethane)s (PEAUs) repeating unit (Table 2).

Figure 5: FT-IR spectrum of optically active polyurethane (TPC-EG-HDI) Figure 5: FT-IR spectrum of optically active polyurethane (TPC-EG-HDI)

Click here to View figure

 

Solubility of PUs

The solubility properties of PEAs were studied in different solvents (Table 3). Polymers were soluble in the polar aprotic solvents such as NMP, DMAc, DMF, DMSO, and m-cresol. The solubility of the polyesters was in the range of 2.1-2.8 g/dL. Good solubility of the polymer was mainly related to the presence of ester units, optically active groups, and polar (s)-histidine bulky pendant from diacid moieties. Difference in solubility of PUs was based on the structure of diol and diisocyanate moieties in the polymer backbone. The APC-EG-HDI PU and APC-EG-MDI PU showed better solubility due to the fact that the related diols contained aliphatic bonds and were more flexible.

Table 3: Solubility of poly(ester-amide-urethane)s

Compound
Diacd APC TPC
Diol EG HQ EG HQ
Diisocyanate HDI MDI HDI MDI HDI MDI HDI MDI
Solvent Solubility of polyurethanes
DMAc + + + + + + + +
DMF + + + + + + + +
NMP + + + + + + + +
DMSO + + + + + + + +
H2SO4 + + + + + ± + ±
MeOH ± ±
EtOH
CHCl3
CH2Cl2
H2O

Concentration: 5 mg ml-1; (+): soluble at room tempratuer, (-): insoluble, and (±): soluble with heating. DMAc: N,N-dimethyl acetamide; DMF: N,N-dimethyl formamide; NMP: N-methyl pyrolidone; DMSO: dimethyl sulfoxide, MeOH: methanol, EtOH: ethanol.

Yield, inherent viscosity, and specific rotation of PUs

Yields and inherent viscosities of obtained polymers via three different methods were compared and the results were differences in values. As the inherent viscosity is a good criterion for estimation of molecular weight, it was concluded that all the polymers showed reasonable molecular weights. Another important outcome was PUs obtained with aromatic linkages had higher viscosity and molecular weight in comparison to fully aliphatic ones.

The inherent viscosity of the polymers was in range 0.18-0.49 dL/g. The results of measurements showed that the synthesized polyurethane from the same monomers specially, aromatic monomers, had a good average chain length growth. Increased viscosity results in increased molecular weight, and then improves physical properties and thermal properties.

Thermal properties of PUs

Thermal properties of PEAs were evaluated with TGA and DTG under air atmosphere at a heating rate of 30 °C/min. Thermal stability of the polymers was evaluated based on T0 (initial decomposition temperature), T10 (temperature for 10 % weight loss), Tmax (maximum decomposition temperature) and residues of the polymers at 600 °C (char yield).

High thermal stability of the polymers was concluded according to the TGA data. It could be mainly related to aromatic and rigid structure of monomers. Because of the higher rigidity and symmetry of TPC and HQ in comparison to the other polymers, the highest thermal stability data was related to it. PEAUs containing aliphatic linkages (APC-EG-HDI and APC-EG-MDI) showed lowest thermal stability among the polymers due to the presence of weak aliphatic units in which reducing of thermal stability was intensified by increasing of aliphatic chains (APC-EG-HDI PU). However, its biodegradation seems more than the other PUs.

All of the prepolymers and PUs showed optically active properties, and the specific rotations of PUs were measured in DMF at a concentration of 0.5 g/dL at 25 ᵒC in the range -43.28 to -80.3.

Characterization of nanocomposites

Although, all polyurethanes were synthesized and well characterized, their thermally stable, biocompatible, biodegradation and antibacterial were improved with preparing their related magnetic nanocomposites though introducing Fe3O4 in to polymer matrix. Among the PEAUs, APC-EG-HDI PU selected due to the appropriate growing polymer chain length then thermal stability properties and biodegradation ability. Magnetic nanoparticles (NPs) in a sonic bath were dispersed well in a solution of monomers. It is demonstrated that using ionic liquids (ILs) could help the NPs to disperse in polymer chains when they are forming by in-situ polymerization method. Good cooperation between organic and inorganic phases is one of the important roles of ILs in preparing of nanocomposites.

XRD and SEM images

According to the X-ray diffraction studies and SEM images, a good quality of magnetic NPs and their good distribution of them in nanocomposites achieved due to good properties. The SEM images are illustrated in figure (6) show synthesis of Fe3O4 in nano scale and good distribution on matrix.

Figure 6: SEM images of Fe3O4 NPs and composie Figure 6: SEM images of Fe3O4 NPs and composie

Click here to View figure

Thermally properties of nanocomposites

The results showed that thermal resistance of PUs was enhanced with adding more Fe3O4 NPs in composites. Preparation of a homogenuse composite 30% wt. Fe3O4 was possible via using ethyl methyl imidazolium bromide as IL and a disperss agent. Thease ionic molecules with hydrogen bondsand polar-polar intraction coverd the NPs to avoid agglomerization and make an uniform composite materials. Although increasing in size of NPs or agglomerization in nanocomposites, cause difficulties in thermal and mechanical properties. TGA curves for APC-EG-HDI PU were showed improving in thermal properties, with increasing NPs weight percentages. Thermal behaviors of polymers were investigated using DSC technique. Polyurethane with 30% wt of Fe3O4, revealed highest and the pure PUs showed lowest glass transition temperature among the prepared polymer based nanocomposites. Also as it should be mention that, polymers obtained through IL method revealed higher thermal stability in comparison to the same nanocomposites obtained without any dispersing agent. It was attributed to the higher dipole-dipole interaction of polymer chains and backbones with NPs.

Magnetic properties

The magnetic Fe3O4 NPs are ferromagnetic. This substance in the absence of an external magnetic field has a spontaneous magnetization and unlike paramagnetism, their magnetic moments interact with themselves. It has magnetism and permanent magnet attract. The orientation of magnetization is in a direction completely.

Figure 7: Magnetic hysteresis loop of polymer (a) and PU/Fe3O4 30% NCs (b) Figure 7: Magnetic hysteresis loop of polymer (a) and PU/Fe3O4 30% NCs (b)

Click here to View figure

Since the magnetic NPs spread in to the polymer, the magnetic properties of nanocomposites were enhanced. This property, compared with pure polymer through a conventional magnetic field by magnet. In this experiment, the PU/Fe3O4 nanocomposites drawn and attracted to the magnet more. It can be seen that with increasing magnetic NPs in the polyurethane matrix, composites tend to be more magnets. When the magnetic composite sample, is into magnetic field, magnetization increases fast. By increasing the applied magnetic field, magnetization increases acceleration decreases. This deceleration continues until its medium magnetization reach to Ms saturation. As magnetic hysteresis loop of pure PU (a) and PU/Fe3O4 30% wt. NCs (b) are illustrated in Figure (7), magnetism can be increased compared to pure polymer substrate.

Biodegradation of polyurethane nanocomposites (PU-NCs)

Hydrolytic degradation of samples that include weight loss percentage of samples in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) with respect to time was evaluated as a measure of the rate of biodegradation. The percentage of weight loss relative to the initial weight of the samples was calculated by the following formula:

Vol13No2_elah_prep_eqn1

However, thermal stability and mechanical strength of polyurethanes synthesized from fully aromatic monomers were not compatible with other polymers, optically active linkages in polyurethane backbone effects on more biodegradability. Among the synthesized polymers, APC-EG-HDI PU with optically active proper ty, showed a good degradation compare to the others as it illustrated in figure (8). Anyway, presence of the aliphatic bonds in polymer chains causes the biodegradability. In addition, using some weight percentage of Fe3O4 magnetic nano particles in polymer matrix defenately accelerates its rate. This property will be more and more with gradual increasing the greater the amount of Fe3O4 into composite. The 30% wt. Fe3O4 PU composite showed more degradation rate than 20% wt., 10% wt. and 5% wt. of magnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles in polymer matrix with more lose weight in the same time, respectively as it shown in figure (9).

Figure 8: Weight lose percentages of polyurethanes Figure 8: Weight lose percentages of polyurethanes

Click here to View figure

 

Figure 9: Weight lose percentages of polyurethane/Fe3O4 nanocomposites graphs Figure 9: Weight lose percentages of polyurethane/Fe3O4 nano composites graphs

Click here to View figure

Anti-bacterial properties

Anti-bacterial property is one of the significant properties in medical, food and packaging industries. It is demonstrated that most NPs have this feature. Hence, presence of the magnetic Fe3O4 NPs showed it. Anti-bacterial investigation was done with 5 types of pathogens; listeria mono-cytogenes Escherichia coli, Bacillus subtilis, Staphylococcus aureus, and Shigella dysentery. About 1.0 grams of the composites were used in this experiment.

Figure 10: Comparative antibacterial effect of optically active PU-Fe3O4% 10 in presence of three pathogens; S. aur, E. coli, and Kleb Figure 10: Comparative antibacterial effect of optically active PU-Fe3O4% 10 in presence of three pathogens; S. aur, E. coli, and Kleb

Click here to View figure

Halo forming around the discs showed a broadly anti-bacterial and anti-bacterial absence of aura indicates a lack of this combination. The halo was engendered around the most samples with pathogens which proved their anti-bacterial feature (figure 10).

Conclusion

Novel polyurethanes containing optically active monomers were prepared using pre-polymer method. Introducing hydrolysable ester, optically active carbon, thermally stable amide, and bulky pendant imidazole units into the polymer backbone disturbed inherent macromolecular degradedly, inter-chain hydrogen bonding, packing efficiency that caused superior properties. In this way, ZVI nano-particles that were synthesized by co-precipitation method were isolated in the polymeric matrix. Using ionic liquid in preparation of nanocomposites was so effect on homogeneous distribution of NPs in polyurethane matrix. Hence, to increase weight percentages of Fe3O4 some properties such as thermally resistance, magnetic, optically active, biocompatibility, and biodegradability were gradually developed. The obtained composites showed appropriate biodegradation that was attributed to the bio nature of amino acid moieties, hydrolysable ester and urethane bonds and biocompatible magnetic NPs simultaneously. Presence of Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles makes the anti-bacterial composites for using medical devices.

Acknowledgments

This project, with support and funding from research section at the Islamic Azad University, Saveh branch was done.

References

  1. Krushna Chandra Pradhan and P. L. Nayak, Synthesis and Characterization of Polyurethane Nanocomposite from Castor Oil- Hexamethylene Diisocyanate (HMDI), Advances in Applied Science Research, 2012, 3, 5, 3045-3052.
  2. K. Chattopadhyay1, K.V.S.N. Raju, Structural engineering of polyurethane coatings for high performance applications, Prog. Polym. Sci., 2007, 32, 352–418.
  3. Piotr Krol, Synthesis methods, chemical structures and phase structures of linear polyurethanes, Properties and applications of linear polyurethanes in polyurethane elastomers, copolymers and ionomers, Progress in Materials Science, 2007, 52, 915–
  4. Meng-Shung Yen, Ping-Yuan Tsai, Study on polyethylene glycol/polydimethylsiloxane mixing soft-segment waterborne polyurethane from different mixing processes, Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 2003, 90, 1, 233–243.
  5. Blackwell, M.R. Nagarajan, Conformational analysis of poly(MDI-butandiol) hard segment in polyurethane elastomers, Polymer, 1981, 22, 2, 202-208.
  6. Costas Methenitis, Georges Pneumatikakis, Marinos Pitsikalis, Joëlle Morcellet, Michel Morcellet, Polymers with amino acids in their side chain: Conformation of poly(N-methacryloyl-L-methionine), Journal of Polymer Science Part A Polymer Chemistry, 1995, 33 (13): 2233 – 2239,.
  7. Tae Oan Ahn Seo, k Choi, Sang Won Lee, and Han Mo Jeong, Thermal and mechanical properties of poly(ether urethane) modified by copolyamide segments, Macromolecular Chemistry and Physics, 1994, 195, 7, 2559–2567.
  8. Chengde Liu, Zhongxing Zhang,  Kerh Li Liu,  Xiping Ni and   Jun Li, Biodegradable thermogelling poly(ester urethane)s consisting of poly(1,4-butylene adipate), poly(ethylene glycol), and poly(propylene glycol), Soft Matter, 2013, 9, 787-794.
  9. Nakkabi ; M. Sadiki ; M. Fahim; N. Ittobane; S. IbnsoudaKoraichi ; H. Barkai ; S. El abed, Biodegradation of Poly(ester urethane)s by Bacillus subtilis, Int. J. Environ. Res., 2015, 9(1):157-162.
  10. Tzong-Liu Wang and Fang-Jung Huang, Synthesis and properties of poly(amide-imide-urethane) thermoplastic elastomers, Polymer International, 1998, 46, 4, 280–284.
  11. Iwona Zarzyka, The Modification of Polyurethane Foams Using New Boroorganic Polyols (II) Polyurethane Foams from Boron-Modified Hydroxypropyl Urea Derivatives, The Scientific World Journal, 2014, Volume 2014, Article ID 363260, 9 pages.
  12. Shahram Mehdipour-Ataei, Elaheh Gharehkhani, Preparation of novel pyridine-based poly(ether amide)s via three different routes and investigation of their properties, High Performance Polymers November 2013, 25: 778-789.
  13. Elaheh Gharekhani, Shahram Mehdipour-Ataei, and Masoud Taghi-Ganji, Soluble and Thermally Stable New Pyridine-based Poly(Ether Imide)s Synthesized Through Conventional and Ionic Liquid Methods, Iranian Polymer Journal, 2011, 20, 6, 491-502.
  14. Bruin, G. J. Veenstra, A. J. Nijenhuis andA. J. Pennings, Design and synthesis of biodegradable poly(ester-urethane) elastomer networks composed of non-toxic building blocks, Rapid Communications, 1988, 9, 8, 589–594,.
  15. Xiaoxia Lia, Hongguo Xiea, Junzhang Lina, Weiyang Xie, Xiaojun Ma, Characterization and biodegradation of chitosan–alginate polyelectrolyte complexes, Polymer Degradation and Stability, 2009, 94, 1, 1–6.
  16. Afsaneh Lavasanifara, John Samuela, Glen S Kwon, Poly(ethylene oxide)-block-poly(l-amino acid) micelles for drug delivery, Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 2002, 54, 2, 169–190.
  17. Hironobu Murata, Fumio Sanda , and Takeshi Endo, Syntheses and Radical Polymerization Behavior of Methacrylamides Having Peptide Moieties:  Effect of the Methylene Chain Introduced between the Methacrylamide and Peptide Moieties on the Polymerizability and Polymer Structure, Macromolecules, 1997, 30, 10, 2902–2906.
  18. Shadpour Mallakpour, Fatemeh Rafiemanzelat, Synthesis and Characterization of Novel Optically Active Poly(ether-urethane)s Modified by Copoly(amide-imide) Segments based on Amino Acid through Diisocyanate Route: Influence of Reaction Parameters, Iranian Polymer, 2006, 15, 1, 79-90.
  19. Khalil Faghihi, Morteza Absalar, Mohsen Hajibeygi, New optically active and thermally stable poly(amide-imide)s containing N,N’-(Bicyclo[2,2,2]oct-7-ene-2,3,5,6-tetracarboxylic)-bis-L-alanine and aromatic diamines: synthesis and characterization, J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 2009, 20, 10.
  20. Shadpour Mallakpour, Mohammad Hassan Shahmohammadi, Synthesis of New Optically Active Poly(amide-imide)s Derived from N,N’-(pyromellitoyl)-bis-S-valine Diacid Chloride and Aromatic Diamines under Microwave Irradiation and Classical Heating, Iranian Polymer, 2005, 14, 5, 473-483.
  21. Shadpour Mallakpour, Fatemeh Rafiemanzelat, Synthesis and Properties of Novel Optically Active Poly(amide imide urethane) Thermoplastic Elastomers by the Reaction of a L-Leucine Based Diacid Chain Extender and PEG-terminated MDI, Iranian Polymer Journal, 2005, 14, 2, 169-180.
  22. Shadpour Mallakpour, Elaheh Kowsari, Synthesis and characterization of new optically active poly(amide-imide)s containing epiclon and L-methionine moieties in the main chain, Polymers for Advanced Technologies, 2005, 16, 10, 732–737,.
  23. Shadpour Mallakpour, Elaheh Kowsari, Soluble novel optically active poly(amide–imide)s derived from N,N′-(4,4′-oxydiphthaloyl)-bis-L-leucine diacid chloride and various aromatic diamines: Synthesis and characterization, Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 2005, 96, 2, 435–442.
  24. Bruin, G. J. Veenstra, A. J. Nijenhuis andA. J. Pennings, Design and synthesis of biodegradable poly(ester-urethane) elastomer networks composed of non-toxic building blocks, Rapid Communications, 1988, 9, 8, 589–594.
  25. Janne Kylmä and Jukka V. Seppälä, Synthesis and Characterization of a Biodegradable Thermoplastic Poly(ester−urethane) Elastomer, Macromolecules, 1997, 30, 10, 2876–2882.
  26. Jianjun Guan1, Michael S. Sacks2, Eric J. Beckman3 andWilliam R. Wagner, Synthesis, characterization, and cytocompatibility of elastomeric, biodegradable poly(ester-urethane)ureas based on poly(caprolactone) and putrescine, Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, 2002, 61, 3, 493–503.
  27. Xian Jun Loha, b, Yun Xuan Tanb, Ziyun Lic, Lin Shin Teod, Suat Hong Gohd, Jun Li, Biodegradable thermogelling poly(ester urethane)s consisting of poly(lactic acid) Thermodynamics of micellization and hydrolytic degradation, Biomaterials, 2008, 29, 14, 2164–2172.
  28. Suresh S. Umare, Ajay S. Chandure, Synthesis, characterization and biodegradation studies of poly(ester urethane)s, Chemical Engineering Journal, 2008, 142, 1, 65–77.
  29. Thorsten Pretsch, , Ines Jakob, Werner Müller, Hydrolytic degradation and functional stability of a segmented shape memory poly(ester urethane), Polymer Degradation and Stability, 2009, 94, 1, 61–73.
  30. Sabzi, S.M. Mirabedini, , J. Zohuriaan-Mehr, M. Atai, Surface modification of TiO2 nano-particles with silane coupling agent and investigation of its effect on the properties of polyurethane composite coating, Progress in Organic Coatings, 2009, 65, 2, 222–228.
  31. O. Siyanbola, K. Sasidhar, B. V. S. K. Rao, Ramanuj Narayan,  O. Olaofe, E. T. Akintayo, K. V. S. N. Raju, Development of Functional Polyurethane–ZnO Hybrid Nanocomposite Coatings from Thevetia peruviana Seed Oil, J Am Oil Chem Soc, 2015, 92, 267–275.
  32. Xiaoyan Gao , Yanchao Zhu, Xu Zhao, Zichen Wang, Dongmin An, Yuejia Ma, Shuang Guan, Yanyan Du, Bing Zhou, Synthesis and characterization of polyurethane/SiO2 nanocomposites, Applied Surface Science, 2011, 257, 10, 4719–4724
  33. Beauty Das, Manabendra Mandal, Aadesh Upadhyay, Pronobesh Chattopadhyay and Niranjan Karak, Bio-based hyperbranched polyurethane/Fe3O4 nanocomposites: smart antibacterial biomaterials for biomedical devices and implants, Biomedical Materials, 2013, 8,3. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-6041/8/3/035003.
  34. Abbas Mohammadi, Mehdi Barikani, Mohammad Barmar, Effect of polyol structure on the properties of the resultant magnetic polyurethane elastomer nanocomposites, Polymers for Advanced Technologies, 2013, 24, 11, 978–985.
  35. Abbas Mohammadi, Mehdi Barikani , Mohammad Barmar, Synthesis and investigation of thermal and mechanical properties of in situ prepared biocompatible Fe3O4/ polyurethane elastomer nanocomposites, Polymer Bulletin, 2015, 72, 2, 219-234.
  36. X. Xu, Y. F. Zheng, “Synthesis and Characterization of Magnetic Nanoparticles and Their Reinforcement in Polyurethane Film”, Key Engineering Materials, 2006, 324-325, 659-662.
  37. Zhanhu Guo, Sung Park, H. Thomas Hahn, Suying Wei, Monica Moldovan, Amar B. Karki and David P. Young, Magnetic and electromagnetic evaluation of the magnetic nanoparticle filled polyurethane nanocomposites, J. Appl. Phys. 2007, 101, 09M511. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.2711074.
  38. Abbas Mohammadia, Mehdi Barikanib, Moslem Mansour Lakouraj, Biocompatible polyurethane/thiacalix[4]arenes functionalized Fe3O4 magnetic nanocomposites: Synthesis and properties, Materials Science and Engineering: C, 2016, 66, 106–118.
  39. Abbas Mohammadi, Mehdi Barikani, Mohammad Barmar, Effect of surface modification of Fe3O4 nanoparticles on thermal and mechanical properties of magnetic polyurethane elastomer nanocomposites, Journal of Materials Science, November 2013, 48, 21, 7493-7502.
  40. Haifeng Zhuang, Hongjun Han, Peng Xu, Baolin Hou, Shengyong Jia, Dexin Wang, Kun Li, Biodegradation of quinoline by Streptomyces sp. N01 immobilized on bamboo carbon supported Fe3O4 nanoparticles, Biochemical Engineering Journal, 2015, 99, 44-47.
  41. Lincheng Zhou, Guiying Li, Taicheng An, Yanfeng Li, Synthesis and characterization of novel magnetic Fe3O4/polyurethane foam composite applied to the carrier of immobilized microorganisms for wastewater treatment, Research on Chemical Intermediates, 2010, 36, 3, 277-288.
(Visited 386 times, 1 visits today)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.