Volume 12, number 2
 Views: (Visited 264 times, 1 visits today)    PDF Downloads: 1391

Fariba E, Jaber R. S. Changes In Bleached Enamel Microhardness After Application of Casein Phosphopeptide-Amorphous Calcium Phosphate (CPP-ACP) and Diode Laser: An in Vitro Study. Biosci Biotech Res Asia 2015;12(2)
Manuscript received on : 
Manuscript accepted on : 
Published online on:  14-12-2015
How to Cite    |   Publication History    |   PlumX Article Matrix

Changes In Bleached Enamel Microhardness After Application of Casein Phosphopeptide-Amorphous Calcium Phosphate (CPP-ACP) and Diode Laser: An in Vitro Study

Ezoji Faribaand Razavi Seyed Jaber1*

Department of Operative Dentistry, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran

ABSTRACT: Tooth bleaching reducesthe surface microhardness of enamel. The aimof this study was to evaluate the effect of CPP-ACP pastewith diode laser simultaneously on surface microhardnessof enamel of bleached teeth. In this in vitro experimental study, forty fivehealthy anterior teeth of bovine were selected and divided into three groups. Basis microhardnessof all the samples was measured by Vickers hardness test. Then all the samples were bleached using 38% H2O2 and their surface microhardnesswere measured. Then, the first group was treated with CPP-ACP paste, the second group was irradiated with diode laser,and in the third group CPP-ACP+diode laser   were used simultaneously. Then the microhardnessof enamel wasmeasured again. One-wayANOVA followed by Tukey test was used for statistical analysis. Significanceset  was considered at p<0.05. Tooth bleaching reduced surface microhardness of enamel. The final microhardness of CPP-ACP group hasshown significant increase compared to the diode laser group (p=0.001), while microhardness of enamel in the first group did not show significant difference compared to the CPP-ACP +diode laser  group (p=0.80). use of CPP-ACP paste increasesmicrohardnessof enamelafter bleaching. But use of diode laser associated with CPP-ACP paste does not have any influence on performance ofCPP-ACP paste.

KEYWORDS: Surface Microhardness; Diode Laser; Tooth Bleaching; CPP-ACP

Download this article as: 
Copy the following to cite this article:

Fariba E, Jaber R. S. Changes In Bleached Enamel Microhardness After Application of Casein Phosphopeptide-Amorphous Calcium Phosphate (CPP-ACP) and Diode Laser: An in Vitro Study. Biosci Biotech Res Asia 2015;12(2)

Introduction

Oral health is the most important aspects of health of every human being. Nowadays, beauty is one of the main demands of dental patients. Teeth bleaching is also a conservative treatment of cosmetic dentistry (1, 2). Various concentrations of substances such as hydrogen peroxide, carbamide peroxide and sodium per borate (with or without heat) are used in the bleaching technique (3, 4).Apart from

the acceptable esthetic results, many studies have determined that tooth bleaching decreasesthe enamel’s calcium, phosphate and fluoride content and leads to diminished mechanical properties such as microhardness and strength (5).

Diode laser has found numerous applications in dentistry. By increase of temperature,this kind of laser leads to release and emission of positive ions and electrons from the considered surface (6).

Casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP) which is prepared from milk casein protein contains calcium and phosphate in amorphous form and transfers calcium  and phosphate to pellicle which results in a high concentration of calcium and phosphate ions on enamel surface and enhances remineralization(7). CPP-ACP application is found in some studies to be the cause of enamel surface microhardness and some studies are stated that its application has no effect on enamel (8, 9).The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of CPP-ACP and diode laser on enamel microhardness after tooth bleaching.

Materials and Methods

In this experimental study, the total numbers of 45 freshly extracted bovine’s incisors without cracks or erosions were cleaned and stored in physiological saline until the beginning of the study. The specimens were divided into three groups of fifteenspecimens. Then they were mounted in self-cured acrylic resin so that their the labial surfaces were exposed and to be parallel with horizontal plane in order thatthe required flat surface for microhardness measuring to be provided.Buccal surface of all the samples were polished with diamond polishing discs (FGM, Brazil). Each disc was used only for 5 surfaces. Basicmicrohardness of all samples of three groupswas measured using Vickers hardness test by applying of 500 g force for 15 seconds (MH1,Coopamicrohardness,Iran). The test was performed three times, and then the average of three tests was recorded as thebasicmicrohardness. In the next stage, all samples of three groups were bleached using 38% H2O2 bleaching gel (boost, opalescence) for 15 minutes according to manufacturer’s instructions. The samples were rinsed and dried with air and water spray for 5 seconds. The microhardness of all the samples of each group was measured according to the above method using Vickers hardness measurement test. In this stage the samples of each group were placed under the following three surface preparing methods.

The first group: in this group, CPP-ACP paste(MI Paste GC Corporation, Tokyo, Japan)in uniform thickness of 1 mm was placed on the surface of the samples using applicator. They were rinsed with water for two minutes after passing the basic time of 15 minutesaccording to the manufacturer’s instructions. The samples were placedin distilled water in incubator at 37˚C for 24 hours and then their surface microhardness were measured according to the above method.

The second group: the samples surface was irradiated with diode laser. The radiation protocol was so that diode laser of 810 nm wavelength and at intensity of 1 Watts was irradiated intermittently (Doctor Smile Erbium and Diode Laser, Italy). The process was so that a radiation at intensity of 1 Watts was applied 6 times each for 5 seconds. There was a 5-second rest between two radiations and no radiation applied in this time (rest time is considered to prevent from pulp damage during increase of temperature). Note that according to the above method pulp temperature rise is less than 5˚C which cannot be harmful for it. After that the samples were placed for 24 hours in distilled water in an incubator at 37˚C and then their microhardness was measured according to the mentioned method for the previous group.

The third group: just like the first group, the surface of the third group was covered with 1 mm of uniform thickness of CPP-ACP paste. Then they were irradiated with diode laser as expressed for the second group. The CPP-ACP paste was rinsed from the surface of the samples after 15 minutes. The samples were placed for 24 hours in distilled water in an incubator at 37˚C. Then their microhardness was measured according to the mentioned method for the previous groups.

Data Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed with Statistical SPSS software version 21. Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to evaluate normal distribution of quantitative data. Because the data had normal distribution, parametric tests were used for data analysis. One-way analysis of variance (one-way ANOVA) and Tukey tests were used for comparison of surfacemicrohardness of bleached teeth enamel in the three groups. significance set  was considered at p<0.05.

Results

The mean and standard deviation surface enamel microhardness for different studied groups have been presented in Table 1. The average of primary microhardnessof all teeth was587.055148.648before any bleaching treatment and the average of microhardness of all teeth after bleaching by hydrogen peroxide was 430.842102.465. The final microhardness of teeth in each group was found to be 494.434127.017 in total, according to the performed procedure.The average of primary microhardness values after bleaching and in final are listed for each group in the following Table (Table 1).

Table 1: The average ofmicrohardness values of teeth in the three studied groups

Groups

(Surface Microhardness)

CPP-ACP paste

(the first group)

Diode Laser

(the second group)

CPP-ACP paste+ Diode Laser

(the third group)

P-value
Primary Microhardness 594.440169.968 588.598141.951 577.130142.205 0.94
Microhardness after Bleaching 428.084123.280 429.75890.904 434.68597.521 0.98
Final Microhardness 544.686142.016 404.13081.286 534.486103.766 0.002

In multiple comparison of groups each other, no significant difference was observed in the section of primary microhardness. The primary microhardness values of the first group compared to the second and the third groups and also the values of the second group compared to the third group had no significant difference (Table 2).

Table 2: P- values of primary microhardnessof groups according to Tukey test

Groups CPP-ACP paste Diode Laser CPP-ACP paste+ Diode Laser
CPP-ACP paste 0.90 0.74
Diode Laser 0.90 0.83
CPP-ACP paste + Diode Laser 0.74 0.83

No significant difference was observed in the stage of surface microhardness of enamel measurement after bleaching with hydrogen peroxide. So that, no significant difference was observed for microhardnessvalues after application of bleaching in the first group compared to the second and the third groups and in the second group compared to the third group (Table 3).

Table 3: P- values of microhardness after application of bleaching in various groups according to Tukey test

Groups CPP-ACP paste Diode Laser CPP-ACP paste+ Diode Laser
CPP-ACP paste 0.96 0.86
Diode Laser 0.96 0.89
CPP-ACP paste + Diode Laser 0.86 0.89

In the last stage, the microhardness of enamelfor the first group inwhich just CPP-ACP paste was used had significant increase compared to the second group in which diode laser used alone.  While the microhardness of enamel for the first group had no significant difference compared to the third group in which CPP-ACP paste was used associated with diode laser.Significant difference was observed in the third group in which two methods of CPP-ACP paste and diode laser were used compared to the second group in which diode laser method was used alone (Table 4).

Table 4:  P- values of final microhardness of various groups according to Tukey test

Groups CPP-ACP paste Diode Laser CPP-ACP paste+ Diode Laser
CPP-ACP paste 0.001 0.80
Diode Laser 0.001 0.003
CPP-ACP paste+ Diode Laser 0.80 0.003

Discussion

Bovine’s teeth were used in this study. The advantage of use of bovine’s teeth is as follows. It is easier to gather them in large number.Distribution of minerals in bovine’s teeth is similar to human’s teeth, while their structural changes are less than enamel of human’s teeth. In addition, bovine’s teeth have larger flat surfaces (10). As stated in some studies, 10% carbamide peroxide and 37% hydrogen peroxide bleaching techniques decrease the microhardness of enamel (11, 12). After bleaching in the current study, enamel microhardnesshad significant reduction. This result is in accordance with many of previous studies results that even used various concentrations of the substance. However, a study noted that carbamide peroxide did not change enamel microhardness (13). Difference between the findings of the studies may be a consequence of different concentration of bleaching agents, different time period for applying of bleaching agents or the type and nature of the tooth itself. Significant increase was observed in final microhardness of the group in which CPP-ACP paste was used for teeth bleaching.

According to study of Bayrak et al. in 2009, use of CPP-ACP and CPP-ACPF pastecan increase surface microhardness of enamel after tooth bleaching (6).Maleki-Pour et al. in 2011 expressed that bleached samples in which fluoride and CPP-ACP was used, had more surface microhardness than untreated bleached samples. This finding was statistically significant. No significant difference was observed between fluoride and CPP-ACP (5). Yamaguchi et al. in 2009 found that the amount of microhardness in demineralized teeth of abovine increased after being exposure to CPP-ACP paste and regarding the evaluation of the effect of this substance on the enamel of the calf, they showed that there is high concentration of inorganic components in the CPP-ACP paste that increase remineralization of tooth enamel (10).Surface microhardness of teeth also was increased by CPP-ACP paste in the current study. One of the considered explanations for that could be the impact of CPP-ACP paste on reduction of demineralization and increase of remineralization. CPP has an important role in transfer of ACP and in localization of large amount of soluble calcium and phosphate. The localization maintains the slope of calcium and phosphate concentration at the surface of tooth enamel and thus facilitates remineralization.

No significant increase in surface microhardness of enamel was observed in the teeth that were only irradiated by diode laser. Balabuc et al. in 2007 reported an increase in surface microhardness of enamel after irradiating with 980 nm diode laser. Microfusion of enamel and change in morphology were mentioned by them as the cause of this phenomenon (14).Difference in the used power can be considered as the cause of difference between the results of the current and Balabuc studies. No studyhas found to investigate 810 nm diode laser’seffect on microhardness of tooth.

Although in the third group of the current study in which CPP-ACP + laser were used, the amount of final microhardness was more than the laser group. This difference is significant, while it did not have a significant difference with CPP-ACP group. In other words, the effectiveness of CPP-ACP pastein increase of surface microhardness of enamel was not change with diode laser radiation.

Vitale et al. performed a study to evaluate effect of diode laser on fluoride absorption of enamel. They found that diode laser increases the amount of fluoride absorption by tooth enamel (15).It was stated in the study of Gonzalez-Rodriguez et al. in 2011 that diode and CO2 lasers increase the amount of fluoride absorption by enamel of tooth (16). Various studies showed that diode laser increases the amount of fluoride absorption by enamel of tooth. However, no study has found to investigate the effect of CPP-ACP paste associated with diode laser on surface microhardness of enamel.

Conclusions

It can be concluded according to the obtained results of the current study that use of CPP-ACP paste increases microhardness of teeth after bleaching. Diode laser alone does not have any effect on final microhardness of teeth and it does not have any influence on efficacy of CPP-ACP paste in increase of enamel microhardness after bleaching.

References

  1. Yu H, Li Q, Cheng H, Wang Y. The effects of temperature and bleaching gels on the properties of tooth-colored restorative materials. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2011;105(2):100-7.
  2. Atali P, Topbasi F. The effect of different bleaching methods on the surface roughness and hardness of resin composites. Journal of Dentistry and Oral Hygiene. 2011;3(2):10-7.
  3. Lima DA, De Alexandre RS, Martins AC, Aguiar FH, Ambrosano GM, Lovadino JR. Effect of curing lights and bleaching agents on physical properties of a hybrid composite resin. Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry [et al]. 2008;20(4):266-73; discussion 74-5.
  4. Moezzyzadeh M, Motamedi S. The effect of CPP-ACP paste on shear bond strength of glass ionomer to dentine. J Dent Sch. 2012;29(4):260-7.
  5. Maleki-Pour M, Shirani F, Mirzakoochaki P, FazelKalbasi Z. Changes in bleached enamel microhardness after appliance of fluoride and CPP-ACP. Journal of Islamic Dental Association of IRAN (JIDAI). 2012;24(1):25-30.
  6. Bayrak S, Tunc ES, Sonmez IS, Egilmez T, Ozmen B. Effects of casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP) application on enamel microhardness after bleaching. American journal of dentistry. 2009;22(6):393-6.
  7. Kebriai F, Attarzadeh H, Davari A, Mardanpour S. Phosphopeptide – Amorphous Calcium Phosphate (CPP-ACP) on Micotensile Bond Strength(μTBS) of Pit and Fissure Sealant in comparison with Fluoride. Yazd J dent res. 2014;2(1):82-91.
  8. Gurgan S, Yalcin F. The effect of 2 different bleaching regimens on the surface roughness and hardness of tooth-colored restorative materials. Quintessence Int. 2007;38(2):e83-7.
  9. Valian A, Moezzizadeh M, MoravejSalehi E. Role of Amorphous Calcium Phosphate in Dentistry. J Dent Sch. 2014;31(4):243-53.
  10. Yamaguchi K, Miyazaki M, Takamizawa T, Inage H, Moore BK. Effect of CPP-ACP paste on mechanical properties of bovine enamel as determined by an ultrasonic device. Journal of dentistry. 2006;34(3):230-6.
  11. Schiavoni RJ, Turssi CP, Rodrigues AL Jr, Serra MC, Pécora JD, Fröner IC. Effect of bleaching agents on enamel permeability. Am J Dent. 2006;19(5):313-6.
  12. Murchison DF, Charlton DG, Moore BK. Carbamide peroxide bleaching: Effects on enamel surface hardness and bonding. Oper Dent. 1992 Sep-Oct;17(5):181-5.
  13. Tezel H, Ertaş OS, Ozata F, Dalgar H, Korkut ZO. Effect of bleaching agents on calcium loss from the enamel surface. Quintessence Int. 2007;38(4):339-47.
  14. Balabuc C, Miron M, Demian C, Negrutiu M, Filip L. Effects of 980nm high power diode laser irradiation on enamel microhardness: TMJ2007;57(2-3):193-195
  15. Vitale MC, Zaffe D, Botticell AR, Caprioglio C. Diode laser irradiation and fluoride uptake in human teeth. European archives of paediatric dentistry: official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry. 2011;12(2):90-2.
  16. Gonzalez-Rodriguez A, de Dios Lopez-Gonzalez J, del Castillo Jde D, Villalba-Moreno J. Comparison of effects of diode laser and CO2 laser on human teeth and their usefulness in topical fluoridation. Lasers in medical science. 2011;26(3):317-24.
(Visited 264 times, 1 visits today)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.